Pennsylvania Supreme Court halts illegal ballot counting
In a win for lawfully conducted elections, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court stepped in on Monday to stop election officials from counting deficient mail-in and absentee ballots. The emergency order came after Bucks County decided to go rogue and count illegal ballots in the race for U.S. Senate between Republican Dave McCormick and incumbent Democrat Senator Bob Casey. The Associated Press had already declared McCormick the winner of the race. Notably, Centre, Montgomery, and Philadelphia counties allegedly also “overlooked the deficiencies.” State law requires a handwritten date on the outer return envelope containing a ballot.
The 4-3 decision on Nov. 18 from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the Middle District ordered all 67 county boards of elections to “comply with prior rulings of this Court in which we have clarified that mail-in and absentee ballots that fail to comply with the requirements of Pennsylvania Election Code, SHALL NOT BE COUNTED for purposes of the election held on November 5, 2024.” The Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Pennsylvania were Petitioners in the case.
Justice Kevin Brobson, joined by Justices David Wecht and Sally Updyke Mundy, emphasized that election officials must follow the Election Code,
“I write separately to disabuse local elections officials of the notion that they have the authority to ignore Election Code provisions that they believe are unconstitutional,” Brobson wrote. “Only the courts under our charter may declare a statute, or provision thereof, unconstitutional.”
The decision ordering all 67 counties in Pennsylvania to follow the law was likely in response to a widely distributed Nov. 14 statement from a Bucks County Board Commission Chair named Diane Ellis-Marseglia, who indicated in a recent Board of Commissioners meeting she would ignore Election Code provisions. In a somewhat puerile statement, Ellis-Marseglia seemed to imply that because some people break the law, she too could also ignore laws that exclude deficient ballots in election counts. Ellis-Marseglia is currently in her fifth term on the Bucks County Board of Commissioners.
During the meeting, Ellis-Marseglia seconded another member’s motion to reject certain categories of ballots, including deficient mail-in ballots. The Nov. 14 commission debate to include the ballots concerned approximately 400 deficient ballots. Ellis-Marseglia seconded the motion with the following statement:
“Yeah, I’m going to second that, mostly because I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn't matter anymore in this country and people violate laws anytime they want. So for me, if I violate this law, it's because I want a court to pay attention to it.”
Ellis-Marseglia later apologized but also said her comment was “inartfully worded” and taken out of context.
Perhaps some of the confusion over whether to count deficient ballots came from a state appeals court that in October ruled undated ballots should be counted. Notably, however, the October 30, 2024 order was narrowly directed for a special election.

The October 30 decision ordered the Philadelphia County Board of Elections to “count the undated mail-in ballots cast” by two Appellees, Brian T. Baxter and Susan T. Kinniry “and the absentee and mail-in ballots cast by the other 67 qualified electors whose ballots were rejected due to outer envelope dating errors in the September 17, 2024 Special Election.” The fuzzy language the court used may have left the door open for the November election. The court wrote that it was “not being asked to make changes with respect to the impending 2024 General Election.”
Image: Thomas Nast
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
- Tax Cuts (and Tariffs) Need Not Be Paid For
- Tune Out the Media for What Matters
- Trump’s Tariffs Tackle Clinton’s China Carnage
- The Fruits of Trump’s Audacious Policies
- Will Trump’s Tariff Ambition Strangle MAGA in the Cradle?
- Navarro Tariffs are Too High
Blog Posts
- The Supreme Court affirms Justice Boasberg lacked jurisdiction over Trump’s deportation decision under the Alien Enemies Act
- DOGE spirit moves downstream -- to new U.S. Attorney who vows to probe the billions lost to L.A.'s homeless industrial complex
- A majority of self-identified leftists think political assassination is a societal good
- One Democrat has an idea for winning: a new ‘Contract with America’
- Kash Patel promotes an FBI agent who called J6 patriots and moms at school board meetings ‘terrorists’
- Tariffs threaten to put the nail in the ‘green’ energy coffin
- U.K. man fired for saying terrorists who murdered 1,200 Israelis are 'violent and disgusting'
- Abolish the Bar: The root of our corrupt and lawless judiciary
- Ignore Bill Ackman’s concerns; Trump’s economic plans are genius UPDATED
- A brief history of the stock market
- Top Colorado statehouse Democrat calls abortion good fiscal policy
- Wake up call for UK energy planners
- Protests for Dummies
- Maybe it's time to clean up the 25th
- Rage as a way of life