WaPo wants Congress to get a pay raise
We are running a $2 trillion debt in a supposedly good economy, and somehow the WaPo editorial board believes that members of Congress deserve a raise:
Congress — yes, even the members you dislike — should get a pay raise
Lawmakers haven’t gotten a bump since 2009. Some have retired because they don’t earn enough.
Members of Congress have a lot of time off, travel a lot, and rake in huge pay, and receive cushy pension packages and other benefits for their poor results. There are 535 members of Congress. A lot of them get elected over and over again, like Pelosi, Schumer, and McConnell, no matter what they do or how poorly they perform.
For context: All members of Congress receive $174,000 per year, and according to ZipRecruiter, the average pay of top executives in the U.S is $93,552, which is barely half of what members of Congress bring home, but private sector bosses work a lot more hours, have much lower pension and other benefits, and have a lot more individual responsibilities. And, they will lose their jobs if they continuously lose money.
Meanwhile, most families in the United States make well under $100,000.
A majority of families in the U.S. are struggling to pay bills and are running up credit card debt, which they can’t pay because of regulations and other policies dictatorially forced on the people by high paid bureaucrats and members of Congress from D.C., where nothing but misery is produced, and most people in the U.S. can’t afford to buy a home.
But according to the WaPo, these poor members of Congress deserve a raise.
In D.C., people fail up—no matter what they do, they move up the economic ladder. Look at Kamala, who barely can speak coherently—she is going to get $20 million for a book advance.

Look at the Clintons and Bidens who lined their families pockets with kickbacks as the WaPo and other media outlets campaigned for them.
How many politicians have amassed great wealth while sucking off the public trough? It is no wonder that there is so much corruption when so many in the media look the other way instead of doing their jobs.
Nope, members of Congress deserve a cut, not a raise. A significant number deserve to be fired for the massive damage they have caused.
Image generated by AI.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Deep State Anatomy and Physiology
- Sisterhood of the Traveling Pronouns
- Trump’s Tariffs: A Chance to Bring Back Lost Jobs
- Trump's Six-Point Plan for Making America Great Again
- Make IRS Sauce The Same For Both Citizen Goose and Politician Gander
- 'Battle at the Border' Documentary is an Insightful Look at Immigration
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
Blog Posts
- The Atlantic's phony migrant tear-jerker about a pitiful 'Maryland father' shipped back to El Salvador falls apart
- Rep. Luna, forgets she’s on the Republican Team!
- Veruca Salt politics or the inevitable result of ‘the personal is political’
- Taliban justice in the streets of Bordeaux, and a Sharia ‘mega city’ comes to Texas
- French judge releases an accused rapist because he’s ‘fairly integrated’
- The Luigi cult is still out there, gushing and festering
- In New York, a tax service company targets illegal aliens as potential customers for child tax credits
- When antisemitic leftists play the ‘Jewish card’
- FDA’s vaccine-rubberstamp Peter Marks forced to resign, and Big Pharma stocks take a nosedive
- Will Colorado pass what’s essentially a ‘trans blasphemy’ bill? *UPDATED*
- Elie Mystal thinks every law before 1965 should be labeled ‘unconstitutional’ and defunct
- The gift that keeps on giving
- Wasting time is hard to do – leftists still manage it
- Give Trump a chance
- Nina 'Scary Poppins' Jankowicz's ex-NGO partner makes clear 'bankrupting Tesla' is his most important accomplishment