WaPo wants Congress to get a pay raise
We are running a $2 trillion debt in a supposedly good economy, and somehow the WaPo editorial board believes that members of Congress deserve a raise:
Congress — yes, even the members you dislike — should get a pay raise
Lawmakers haven’t gotten a bump since 2009. Some have retired because they don’t earn enough.
Members of Congress have a lot of time off, travel a lot, and rake in huge pay, and receive cushy pension packages and other benefits for their poor results. There are 535 members of Congress. A lot of them get elected over and over again, like Pelosi, Schumer, and McConnell, no matter what they do or how poorly they perform.
For context: All members of Congress receive $174,000 per year, and according to ZipRecruiter, the average pay of top executives in the U.S is $93,552, which is barely half of what members of Congress bring home, but private sector bosses work a lot more hours, have much lower pension and other benefits, and have a lot more individual responsibilities. And, they will lose their jobs if they continuously lose money.
Meanwhile, most families in the United States make well under $100,000.
A majority of families in the U.S. are struggling to pay bills and are running up credit card debt, which they can’t pay because of regulations and other policies dictatorially forced on the people by high paid bureaucrats and members of Congress from D.C., where nothing but misery is produced, and most people in the U.S. can’t afford to buy a home.
But according to the WaPo, these poor members of Congress deserve a raise.
In D.C., people fail up—no matter what they do, they move up the economic ladder. Look at Kamala, who barely can speak coherently—she is going to get $20 million for a book advance.

Look at the Clintons and Bidens who lined their families pockets with kickbacks as the WaPo and other media outlets campaigned for them.
How many politicians have amassed great wealth while sucking off the public trough? It is no wonder that there is so much corruption when so many in the media look the other way instead of doing their jobs.
Nope, members of Congress deserve a cut, not a raise. A significant number deserve to be fired for the massive damage they have caused.
Image generated by AI.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
- Tax Cuts (and Tariffs) Need Not Be Paid For
- Tune Out the Media for What Matters
- Trump’s Tariffs Tackle Clinton’s China Carnage
- The Fruits of Trump’s Audacious Policies
- Will Trump’s Tariff Ambition Strangle MAGA in the Cradle?
- Navarro Tariffs are Too High
Blog Posts
- One Democrat has an idea for winning: a new ‘Contract with America’
- Kash Patel promotes an FBI agent who called J6 patriots and moms at school board meetings ‘terrorists’
- Tariffs threaten to put the nail in the ‘green’ energy coffin
- U.K. man fired for saying terrorists who murdered 1,200 Israelis are 'violent and disgusting'
- Abolish the Bar: The root of our corrupt and lawless judiciary
- Ignore Bill Ackman’s concerns; Trump’s economic plans are genius
- A brief history of the stock market
- Top Colorado statehouse Democrat calls abortion good fiscal policy
- Wake up call for UK energy planners
- Protests for Dummies
- Maybe it's time to clean up the 25th
- Rage as a way of life
- An interesting challenge on tariff logic from former Reagan budget director, David Stockman
- Billionaire heiress Rep. Sara Jacobs makes a fool of herself in bid to defund DOGE
- Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth understand that war is about winning while minimizing American casualties