Debate Questions That The Moderators Should (But Won’t) Ask Biden
Given the media’s reporting on and/or suppression of a host of issues surrounding the Russia Hoax, COVID, BLM riots, January 6th, the Hunter Biden laptop, the DOJ lawfare, and so many more, don’t hold your breath that their representatives will ask the most important questions in the upcoming presidential debates. President Trump should thwart them by working those questions into his own answers.
In other words, he might say something like, “Look, folks, you aren’t asking the questions that the vast majority of Americans want answered. Here is one of the questions you should ask my opponent...” If he is accused of not answering the question, he should simply reply that he is giving his answer whether they like it or not.
Following are a few straightforward questions President Trump could suggest that they ask President Biden. He can invite President Biden to answer them even if the debate moderators refuse to ask them.
Image by AI
First, Mr. President, during the 2020 debate, President Trump pointed to the information found on your son’s laptop and claimed it incriminated both you and Hunter. He called you corrupt. You answered that President Trump’s assertions were “a bunch of garbage” and referenced an open letter from some 51 retired intelligence officers who said that the laptop should not be taken seriously and had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Subsequently, the Wall Street Journal and others have reported that not only was the laptop genuine, but that your own campaign adviser at the time, now Secretary Blinken, orchestrated creating and publicizing that false letter. Now that we know Mr. Trump’s claims were not a bunch of garbage, how would you amend your response from 2020, and will you commit to providing all banking, email, and phone records requested by the House Oversight Committee?
Second, Mr. President, in the 2020 debate, you said that your son had “not made any money from China.” We now know through just some of the records that the House Oversight Committee obtained that Hunter, his associates, and other Biden family members received more than $24 million between 2014 and 2019, much of it from China. Two questions: Firstly, why were so many Biden family members receiving money from these foreign entities? And secondly, do you concede that, to most voters, this has the appearance of impropriety?
Third, Mr. President, many people say that the story about your son’s laptop is really a story about you, given that emails, other documents, and your son’s recent deposition testimony reveal that you are, in fact, “the big guy.” Whether you agree with that or not, several surveys show that the overwhelming majority of Americans believe the suppressed laptop story altered the 2020 election results. Technometrica, recognized as the most accurate pollster in recent presidential elections, found that 79% of Americans believe Donald Trump would likely have been president if the truth about the laptop being real had been known. Was fraud-based censorship about this story election interference and, if it was, does this make you an illegitimate president? If not, why not?

Fourth, Mr. President, you have claimed that Americans who question the results of the 2020 election are “threats to democracy.” The active suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story has become a story in and of itself. Given that we know that the media, your own campaign adviser, Mr. Blinken, and the FBI all participated in suppressing the truth, isn’t it quite understandable that most voters would be suspicious of the election results?
Fifth, Mr. President, the House Oversight Committee claims that the Biden family and its business associates created a complicated web of more than 20 companies, most of which were LLCs, meant to conceal money received from foreign nationals and then distributed to at least nine different Biden family members. Did nine different Biden family members really receive money from foreign nationals? If the shell companies were not created for the purpose of hiding distributions to family members, what was the purpose of the many obscurely named shell companies?
Sixth, Mr. President, last year, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board published a piece in response to the House Oversight Committee’s 36-page report on the Biden family business ties. It stated that “Bank records show that more than $10 million was delivered to Biden family members, associates and companies from these foreign entities, and in curious ways.” It also says that the report suggests the main Biden family business is influence peddling. Is that true? If not, what is the main family business?
Those are questions that ought to be asked of Biden, but realistically, there is about as much chance of an MSM representative asking one of these questions as there is of President Trump getting a fair trial in New York or Georgia. The debate moderators won’t ask these questions for two simple reasons.
Firstly, in many cases, their companies were complicit in the effort to quash or trivialize the factual information provided in the questions themselves. Secondly, they know there are no good answers President Biden can provide and that his responses (even or especially if he goes into his “lying dog-faced pony soldier” routine) will most likely make matters worse for him.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Russia Tariff Canard
- When The Government Brutalizes Children
- Trump’s Global Bunker Buster Day
- Phone-Free Schools: Banning Phones to Protect Schoolchildren
- Out-of-Control Courts
- ‘Democracy,’ Establishment Style
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
Blog Posts
- Progressivism is an auto-immune disease
- Time to tariff up: Stop funding our own collapse
- Major victory from SCOTUS in Trump deportation case
- Mississippi on the move
- We called him ‘Daniel el travieso’
- The Supreme Court affirms Justice Boasberg lacked jurisdiction over Trump’s deportation decision under the Alien Enemies Act
- DOGE spirit moves downstream -- to new U.S. Attorney who vows to probe the billions lost to L.A.'s homeless industrial complex
- A majority of self-identified leftists think political assassination is a societal good
- One Democrat has an idea for winning: a new ‘Contract with America’
- Kash Patel promotes an FBI agent who called J6 patriots and moms at school board meetings ‘terrorists’
- Tariffs threaten to put the nail in the ‘green’ energy coffin
- U.K. man fired for saying terrorists who murdered 1,200 Israelis are 'violent and disgusting'
- Abolish the Bar: The root of our corrupt and lawless judiciary
- Ignore Bill Ackman’s concerns; Trump’s economic plans are genius UPDATED
- A brief history of the stock market