Harvard study: Extraordinary media bias against Trump

A study prepared by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard reveals a shocking level of media bias against President Trump.  This comes as no surprise to anyone – friend or foe of the president. But the extreme percentage of negative coverage of the president is absolutely breathtaking.   I'm amazed that the New York Times had 13% "positive" coverage of Trump, although Harvard academics may have a different definition of "positive" from yours or mine. Trump coverage was slightly more positive when it came to individual issues:   Heat Street: The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative. On the economy, the proportion was more balanced – 54% negative to 46% positive: The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on...(Read Full Post)