Neil Gorsuch and the living Constitution lie

While leftists are outraged at the idea of banning immigrants who may spit on our Constitution, banning judges who would actually uphold it is a different matter.  This brings us to the opposition to President Trump's Supreme Court pick, Judge Neil Gorsuch, whom The New York Times actually calls a "Nominee for a Stolen Seat."  In reality, the Times advocates a perversion of judicial philosophy that long ago had stolen Americans' birthright. The paper complains that like Justice Antonin Scalia, Gorsuch "is an originalist, meaning he interprets the Constitution's language to mean what it was understood to mean when it was written[.]"  Leftists prefer that the Constitution be considered a "living document," interpreted to "suit the times" (and the New York Times).  This just guarantees a dying republic. Why?  Consider: imagine I violate the language of a contract...(Read Full Post)