John Judis, writing for the New Republic, chides his fellow liberals for not backing Barack Obama's move into Libya.  Judis, in his defense of President Obama's Libya action, sounds suspiciously like an evil Bushie (as in a George W. Bush stalwart) -- or a Bushie as caricatured by liberal propaganda.  Might liberals say that Judis is channeling Donald Rumsfeld?    Judis asks liberals to weigh three questions when judging Barack Obama's decision to throw in with France and Great Britain to do something in Libya.  Judis asks liberals if they'd prefer:  (1) That gangs of mercenaries, financed by the country's oil wealth, conduct a bloodbath against Muammar Qaddafi's many opponents?(2) That Qaddafi himself, wounded, enraged, embittered, and still in power, retain control of an important source of the world's oil supply, particularly for Europe, and be able to spend the wealth he derives from it to sow discord in the region?(3) And...(Read Full Post)