There is a deliberate attempt on the part of many in the mainstream media, and within the Democrat party, to confuse evidentiary concepts when it comes to tying the Chinese Communist regime to the worldwide coronavirus pandemic.  This commonly takes the form of denial that there’s “evidence” the virus spread from a Wuhan China lab.  While to date there is has been no production of direct physical evidence tying the lab to the virus, there is abundant circumstantial evidence to this effect.  And circumstantial evidence is perfectly good evidence. Legally there are two broad categories of evidence, direct and circumstantial.  Examples of direct evidence are eyewitnesses, fingerprints, photographs, DNA, etc.  Circumstantial evidence is inferential and ties its target to a crime or civil wrong.  Obviously, having direct evidence of wrongdoing is preferable, and juries (particularly modern ones) expect it. However, direct evidence is...(Read Full Article)