On Oct. 20, months after the “immigration invasion” of Europe began -- whose long-term impact goes far beyond temporary obsessions like email servers and Benghazi -- one of the Wall Street Journal’s chief pundits finally addressed the subject.  Bret Stephens wrote an op-ed, “In Defense of Christendom.” The reason for the long silence is not hard to guess.  The Wall Street Journal has long been wedded to the notion of open borders.   Never mind that Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman admonished the paper almost twenty years ago “It’s just obvious you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.” The Journal has remained deaf to Friedman’s irrefutable argument that in a redistributionist state, unlimited immigration, with its unlimited demands on the public purse, at minimum will destroy  limited government.  So how should the socially conservative editorial page react to open...(Read Full Article)