|
| |||||||
|
« Assange signs $1.3 million book deal |
Blog Home Page
| UN map reveals 'no noted improvements' in Afghan security »
December 27, 2010 2011: The year of insolvency for some states
My home state of Illinois is a fiscal basket case, as the New York Times points out:
For most of this year, the state of Illinois has lacked the money to pay its bills. Some of its employees have been evicted from their offices for nonpayment of rent, social service groups have laid off hundreds of workers while waiting for checks, pharmacies have closed for lack of Medicaid payments. Faced with $4.5 billion in overdue payments, Illinois has proposed a precarious plan to sell its delinquent bills to Wall Street investors in exchange for cash, calculating that the interest it must pay the investors will be less than the late fees it owes. Eventually, the buck will stop in Washington. As George Will points out, giving int to pressure from these spendthrift states will only lead to further catastrophe: States' troubles are becoming bigger. Hitherto, local governments have acquired infusions of funds from federal budget earmarks, which are now forbidden. Furthermore, states are suffering "ARRA hangover" - withdrawal from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a.k.a. the 2009 stimulus. With about $150 billion for state and local governments, it raised the federal portion of state budgets from about a quarter to a third. Also, in 2009 and 2010, states and localities borrowed almost $200 billion through the ARRA's Build America Bonds program, under which Washington pays 35 percent of the interest costs. Republicans, in another victory over the president in negotiations on extending the Bush tax rates, extinguished that program, which they say primarily produced more public-sector employees. "Too big to fail?" Where have we heard that before? State governments have nearly doubled the number of employees over the last decade. They thought the good times would roll on forever, and now the piper must be paid and the coffers are empty. Making promises in the name of the people you can't possibly keep is dishonest, so if pensions are reworked in order to restore some fiscal sanity to state governments, it should be done fairly but with the thought that it is taxpayers who are on the hook for this malfeasance and adjustments should be made with them in mind. Holding taxpayers hostage to the government unions is wrong and Congress should make sure that never happens. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|