|
| |||||||
|
« Stem Cell Promises vs. Stem Cell Results |
Blog Home Page
| Israel as the coal miner's canary »
December 17, 2009 Democrats Violate 200-Year-Old Standing Senate Rules
On Saturday, December 12, Erick Erickson of Redstate.com published an article titled "Fight." This short, incisive article presented a crystal clear methodology Republican Senators could use to effectively hobble the monstrosity that has come to be known as "Obamacare." Relying on the many parliamentary procedures specifically created to force slow, careful deliberation on important issues, these tactics, if Republicans conjured the guts to use them, could grind this train wreck to a halt.
Yesterday, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) decided to do just that. Senators have the right to request that any amendment offered to pending legislation be read aloud in its entirety. In the interest of time, the Senate usually dispenses with this rule. Given the way Democrats have been so secretive about the healthcare bill however, the rule seems fortuitous, and makes one wonder why Republicans haven't used it until now. They claim they have had a plan in place for a while, and a memo from Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) suggests this is true. According to this theory, they were only waiting to pull out the stops until Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and the Democrats finally revealed the full bill they've been working on in secret. Still, it is a curious coincidence that Republicans decide to use this tactic the first time only days after it is suggested by one of the most widely-read conservative bloggers. In any event, when Vermont Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders offered a 767 page amendment to the healthcare bill yesterday, Coburn chose to invoke that rule. What followed was a travesty that should serve as an object lesson to anyone still wavering that these Democrats are corrupt beyond salvation. The Senate Clerk began to read the amendment. As Redstate's Erickson explained today, Senate rules require that when one senator has the floor, no other senator may take action. Having asked for an amendment to be read, such an amendment must be read in its entirety. According to the Riddick's Senate Procedure guide: Under Rule XV, paragraph 1, and Senate precedents, an amendment shall be read by the Clerk before it is up for consideration or before the same shall be debated unless a request to waive the reading is granted; in practice that includes an ordinary amendment or an amendment in the nature of a substitute, the reading of which may not be dispensed with except by unanimous consent, and if the request is denied the amendment must be read and further interruptions are not in order. (Emphasis added.)
Michelle Bachman has called it "Gangster Government," and this columnist has been detailing Democrats' institutional corruption for years now. See here and here, for example. "Third world kleptocrats..." I couldn't have said it better.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|