|
| |||||||
|
« CBO using wrong numbers of uninsured |
Blog Home Page
| Presumed Ignorant »
November 14, 2009 How many at Fort Hood died because of the Army's gun ban?
If I were the parent or spouse of one of those killed in the terrorist attack at Fort Hood last week, I would begin raising utter hell in the public arena the minute my loved one was buried and my tears dried up. Not only did outrageous political correctness convince otherwise rational people in authority to put our soldiers in unnecessary danger, but since 1993, there has been a gun-ban in place on our army bases.
Here we have soldiers, expertly trained in the safe and efficient use of guns, yet they are prevented by a cockamamie Clinton ruling from carrying handguns on their bases. From reports of the Ft. Hood terrorist attack, the Islamic radical enemy within was allowed a full 10 minutes of completely protected firing at soldiers before someone with a gun arrived on the scene to fire back. From the report on Fox News:
At this rate, we will be extremely fortunate to have men and women in the entire United States willing to sign up for military service. Not only should this horrendous terror attack never have happened because all the red flags were there, but it would also seem quite certain that the gun ban resulted in more inexcusable loss of life. As the Fox News report says, statistics are pretty clear on the additional loss of life in public shootings where gun bans are in force:
Now, it's not hard to understand that draft-dodging, war protester, Bill Clinton, thought this base gun ban was a good idea. But we might want to ask ourselves why on earth the ban was not lifted by President Bush immediately after 9/11. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have been churning out reports and analyses of the homegrown terror threat for at least a decade and yet we remain a nation seemingly bent on national suicide.
This is disgusting. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|