How Democrats get (their version of) a 'free and fair' election, coronavirus edition
In their effort to extend the fear factor lockdown in many blue states up to the presidential election this November, and to capitalize on the China Pulmonary Plague to gain power, the Democrats are attempting to activate their real and imagined constituents with the demand to vote by mail. A version of a quote typically attributed to the USSR's communist leader Joseph Stalin generally provides the preferred approach for free and fair elections to his fellow Democrat travelers: "It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes."
In my home state of Pennsylvania, in nearby Allegheny County, which includes the City of Pittsburgh and its surrounding suburbs, a lawsuit was filed to have the voter rolls adjusted to address about 1,600 dead people on its voter rolls, close to 7,500 voter registrations that were flagged as duplicates, 1,523 registered voters who claim to be 100 years old and over, and 1,178 registered voters who are missing dates of birth. In addition to this lawsuit, in January, Allegheny County removed about 69,000 inactive voters from its voter rolls after threats of a lawsuit by Judicial Watch.
Judicial Watch also filed a suit against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for allegedly having more than 800,000 inactive voters on its voter rolls. What could possibly be wrong with mailing out hundreds of thousands of ballots to inactive voters who may have moved, or be deceased, or are incorrectly identified?
In the most recent presidential election between President Trump and Mrs. Clinton, a recount was ordered in Michigan due to an appeal by Green candidate Jill Stein. Overall, state records showed that 10.6 percent of the precincts in the 22 counties that began the re-tabulation process couldn't be recounted because of state law that bars recounts for unbalanced precincts or ones with broken seals. The problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant that officials couldn't recount votes in 392 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. Two thirds of those precincts had too many votes in comparison to the voter rolls.
Voting "irregularities" are not new. Voter fraud in Chicago, for national, state, and local elections, has been standard fare. The Democrat machine has had complete control of the voting rolls, the poll-watchers, and vote-counting in this heavily Democrat area.
Impossible outcomes are also evident in past elections. As example, in the year 2000 election in Pennsylvania, voters showed up at their polling locations to vote for Al Gore for President or George Bush and also a hotly contested U.S. Senate seat.
In this past Pennsylvania election, the vote totals were 2,465,412 (51%) for Al Gore and 2,264,309 (46%) for George Bush. For Pennsylvania's U.S. senator race, the vote total was 2,473,118 (53%) for Republican Rick Santorum and 2,134,734 (45%) for Democrat Ron Klink. If you know anything about far-left Al Gore and far-right Rick Santorum, their differences could not be more stark. We are asked to believe that the same group of voters walked into their polling locations and pulled the lever for Al Gore and Rick Santorum. In the vernacular of Monday Night Football, "come on, man."
Illegal non-citizens should vote, vote-by-mail, no identification needed to vote, ballot-harvesting, criminals should vote, an adolescent-minded 16-year-old should vote, no need to clean up the voter registration rolls, ad infinitum, are the mechanisms to achieve the Democrats' goal of a "free and fair" election. What better time to have a vote-by-mail fraud election than a health emergency, if only the Democrats and their mainstream media propaganda arm can keep the peasant class fearful of death by Beijing Bat-Gobbler Disease until the mail-in vote fraud election this November?
Image credit: Pixabay public domain