Every day, no matter what the subject is, almost all supposed journalists are on a relentless campaign to take out President Trump. The bias is not so hard to spot.

When the UN or any other supposed experts spews forth with predictions on the climate, almost all media outlets either print or repeat them as if they are accurate with no questions asked. No matter how wrong previous predictions have been, they are never questioned because most journalists have the same extreme leftist agenda as the people making up the predictions. We will never see the so-called fact checker, Glenn Kessler, at the Washington Post, or any other fact checker, question these people pushing an agenda.

When President Obama and his minions were continually lying in order to pass Obamacare, Congressional Budget Office (CBO) went along with the obvious made up numbers and most journalists just acted like the obvious lies were true and people who disagreed were called racists. The race card is always played, because facts are so inconvenient to the agenda.

When CBO makes predictions of revenue shortfalls because of tax rate cuts, the media will just repeat them as if they are gospel even though previous predictions were massively wrong by amount and direction.

When supposed “experts” predict that over two million Americans will die from the coronavirus, the number was repeated as if it was factual. When a short time later, the same “experts” lowered their prediction by 96% the media repeated that number as if it was factual. Somehow, being off by almost 100% did not give journalists pause.

When California's Governor Gavin Newsom pulled a number out of his tail and said over twenty million Californians would get the virus, that was O.K. to engender panic.

When New York's Governor Andrew Cuomo lectures the public, with no evidence, that the rest of the country is going to experience the severe problems of New York, they act like he is a genius and knows what he is talking about.

But when Trump repeats numbers that he was given -- that 100,000 to 240,000 might die from the virus -- we get a headline from WP, that is repeated elsewhere, that the estimate is questioned and appeared rushed.

I missed the headline that said the 2.2 million death estimate was rushed. Maybe the WP rushed the estimate in 1922 that coastal cities would soon be gone. Maybe the UN rushed its estimate that we only had ten years left to solve the climate problems in 1989.

Trump Advisers Doubt White House's Coronavirus Deaths Estimate, Expert Says It Appeared Rushed: Report

How many lives would be lost if we had implemented Democrat policies to get rid of petroleum products and we no longer had planes, ships, trucks and planes to transport medical supplies, equipment and drugs around the U.S and world quickly?

How many potential lives would be lost if we didn’t have hospital ships powered by oil?

Does anyone believe that politicians and bureaucrats around the world can control temperatures, sea levels and storm activity forever if we just give them trillions of our hard-earned dollars when they see how they handled the virus? Here is a hint: The climate is much bigger and harder to control than the virus.

Image credit: Pixabay public domain