Low-information Democrat regrets voting for Buttigieg

The www dot makes people say peculiar things that don't fare well under scrutiny.  One of the most frequently spoken clichés is that Trump voters are low-information.

Personally, I find the many liberals surrounding my life terribly uninformed.  The dumber they are, the more insistently they say irrational things — that Trump will change our official language to Russian, Trump will declare martial law if re-elected, Trump will go crazy at the SOTU and foam at the mouth.

These visceral predictions reflect a mind twisting toward paranoia and insistent upon issuing disinformation.

And the low-information sucker/voter buys it; he shambles along with a pre-decided yaw to the left.

Here is a short video of a democratic Iowa caucus voter who didn't know that Mayor Pete is gay and calls himself married to a man.

I think everyone involved handled the situation pretty well, but how low-information is someone who hasn't picked up even a clue that Pete's central attractiveness to liberals is based upon his sexuality? 

Submerged as we are in a gay-crazy media culture not of our choosing, how could anyone miss it?

Low-information cuts both ways; there are those who will cast a vote for this self-righteous preacher from a whack cartoon based solely upon the fact that he is gay.  The left depends upon this brand of chump.

And the left loves novelty candidates with direct appeal to the boob studying intersectionality at the local university.  They desire the holy birth of a dark-hued Muslim lesbian woman wearing a pussy hat while spouting failed Marxist philosophy.

As for Bible-thumpers, I actually like this voter's reaction; it bears a certain mark of honesty one finds infrequently.  The caucus worker merely regurgitates liberal cant and points to her son as an example of how virtuous she is.

The little old lady stands unmovable upon her Bible. 

Good for her.

But how in God's name did she miss the shiny factual object that forms a central basis for Pete's appeal to her now freakish political party?

She missed it because Democrats see only what they wish to see.

By lowering the threshold of low-information voters to a new and probable all-time low, Democrats gain the only truncated advantage they possess.

The www dot makes people say peculiar things that don't fare well under scrutiny.  One of the most frequently spoken clichés is that Trump voters are low-information.

Personally, I find the many liberals surrounding my life terribly uninformed.  The dumber they are, the more insistently they say irrational things — that Trump will change our official language to Russian, Trump will declare martial law if re-elected, Trump will go crazy at the SOTU and foam at the mouth.

These visceral predictions reflect a mind twisting toward paranoia and insistent upon issuing disinformation.

And the low-information sucker/voter buys it; he shambles along with a pre-decided yaw to the left.

Here is a short video of a democratic Iowa caucus voter who didn't know that Mayor Pete is gay and calls himself married to a man.

I think everyone involved handled the situation pretty well, but how low-information is someone who hasn't picked up even a clue that Pete's central attractiveness to liberals is based upon his sexuality? 

Submerged as we are in a gay-crazy media culture not of our choosing, how could anyone miss it?

Low-information cuts both ways; there are those who will cast a vote for this self-righteous preacher from a whack cartoon based solely upon the fact that he is gay.  The left depends upon this brand of chump.

And the left loves novelty candidates with direct appeal to the boob studying intersectionality at the local university.  They desire the holy birth of a dark-hued Muslim lesbian woman wearing a pussy hat while spouting failed Marxist philosophy.

As for Bible-thumpers, I actually like this voter's reaction; it bears a certain mark of honesty one finds infrequently.  The caucus worker merely regurgitates liberal cant and points to her son as an example of how virtuous she is.

The little old lady stands unmovable upon her Bible. 

Good for her.

But how in God's name did she miss the shiny factual object that forms a central basis for Pete's appeal to her now freakish political party?

She missed it because Democrats see only what they wish to see.

By lowering the threshold of low-information voters to a new and probable all-time low, Democrats gain the only truncated advantage they possess.