Ease of documenting MSM's/Democrats' use of word 'spying' about surveillance reveals genuine 'derangement'
Are the media and Democrats actually trying to prove themselves to be full of crap? Given their own history of calling the federal government's surveillance efforts "spying," attempting to claim that A.G. Barr's use of that term is out of bounds only makes them look like hypocrites (and worse). Yesterday, Twitter offered a huge number of examples of their fondness for the term when Americans not identified with the Trump administration were surveilling.
The Ace of Spades collected a very large number — overwhelming, in fact — of such examples in tweets issued by the real journalists of our age, in particular Sean Davis of The Federalist, who really went to town:
Totally not spying you guys. pic.twitter.com/IFed56PDRe
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
When Bush did it, not only was it spying, it was the kind of spying that needed to be banned. pic.twitter.com/AsTo8duvkA
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
Back in 2014, per the New York Times, spying was defined as being "subjected to surveillance by the federal government." Oh how the Times have changed! pic.twitter.com/nmWK5lZ7i1
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
Old and busted: Domestic spying is inconsistent with the values of this country.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
New hotness: Spying is very consistent with the values of this country because Orange Man Bad. pic.twitter.com/4N9wCeZaAV
It's only warantless domestic spying when Republicans do it. When Obama does it, it's merely the utilization of national security letters to avoid court oversight of surreptitious domestic electronic surveillance of the communications of private U.S. citizens. pic.twitter.com/mFug1blKru
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
CNN's meltdown over Barr's accurate use of the word "spying" is even more curious given that CNN described a previous GOP AG's testimony regarding the exact same DOJ program as "domestic spying." pic.twitter.com/bc96J57r7t
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
'Member that time CNN referred to FBI agents secretly collecting communications of American citizens as spying? And 'member how there was so much spying via video games that the FBI worried it might be accidentally spying on its own agents? I 'member. pic.twitter.com/k3AaILlCaM
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
Really makes you think, @CillizzaCNN. pic.twitter.com/odFQqccbba
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
Totally not spying you guys. pic.twitter.com/IFed56PDRe
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 12, 2019
Sean Davis was not alone:
How embarrassing that the NYT used to call spying spying and will no longer ever be able to call spying spying, if they wish to remain consistent with their utterly ridiculous new standard that the use of wiretaps, overseas intelligence assets, other surveillance is not spying. pic.twitter.com/O4nwrHzbBM
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) April 12, 2019
And the great Andrew McCarthy provided the proper literary reference for understanding the attitude of the FBI's counterintelligence operation where Peter Strzok worked:
"When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” Or: https://t.co/WCpxo4C3ik pic.twitter.com/McswETKOGd
— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) April 12, 2019
Sane people and institutions would realize that feigning outrage over their enemies' use of a word they had themselves frequently employed for the same phenomenon would only damage their own credibility. Especially when their bête noire is fond of — and accomplished at — calling out their own hypocrisy.
Yet here we have leading Democrats, media, and even the former director of the FBI piously denouncing the use of the word "spying" by A.G. Barr to describe the undeniable use of electronic surveillance (AKA wiretapping) and even the attempted insertion of covert agents into the Trump campaign.
I don't think they imagine that the internet has developed amnesia. Nor have they developed amnesia about their own fondness for the term "spying" to describe domestic surveillance. In my view, the explanation lies in a compulsion, driven by clinical derangement, specifically Trump Derangement Syndrome, that short-circuited all rational consideration of the wisdom of this approach.
Their derangement is leading them to slit their own throats, and they don't even see it. They are making themselves objects of scorn.
We live in a remarkable time.




