Stand by for leftist heads exploding if this highly plausible theory – based on the classic investigatory question "cui bono" ("who benefits?") – gains traction.  Daniel Greenfield offers a startling counter-hypothesis about the alleged Russian hacking of the DNC and the subsequent reveal of emails.  Keeping in mind that the FBI has not done a forensic analysis of the actual DNC servers that were hacked, and that therefore we cannot be confident in the purportedly "unanimous verdict" of the "Intelligence Community" that Russia hacked the computers, Greenfield grants that assumption as the basis of discussion and comes up with a conclusion radically different as to the goal of the caper. At his blog Sultan Knish, Greenfield writes: Let's look at what the Russians were actually doing during the election.  They had set up fake Facebook sites aimed at the left on issues ranging from Black...(Read Full Post)