« The craziest response (so far) to the Nunes Memo | Merit-based migration must mean moral merit, too »
February 3, 2018
Why the FISA memo could lead to perjury convictions of Comey & Co.
The 2018 Groundhog Day release of the Nunes FISA memo was preceded by partisan and establishment objections that its disclosure would somehow jeopardize … something. The contents of the memo now show the objections by anti-Trump forces in this historic matter were certainly a case where they “doth protest too much.” J. Marsolo explains why FISA warrant procurers James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, and Dana Boente have reason to be nervous: “The Memo confirms that the political origins of the Steele Dossier, that it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC, were not disclosed to the FISA court.” In other words, it seems the procurers of the FISA warrants that are the subject of the Nunes memo failed to disclose material facts on which the FISA judges could determine the credibility of the probable cause before issuing and re-issuing the warrants. The Fourth Amendment warrant authorizes and justifies what is...(Read Full Post)