Hillary's server no security threat, but Russians are altering emails?

Let's see if this old seasoned citizen can get his brain wrapped around this latest bit of liberal lying.

Earlier this year, the Clinton campaign leaders were on every available news forum in the country assuring us that even if Hillary had used her Chappaqua bathroom server to conduct the business of the nation, there was no harm because there was no evidence that anyone had hacked that totally vulnerable repository of state secrets.  All the way back to the Whitewater scandal, we have been hearing that first line of defense from the Clinton's: "There is no evidence."  That has sometimes proved true, because the Clintons long ago surrounded themselves with a picket of legal gunsels who have proved quite adept at burying incriminating documentation and, some would even say, witnesses.

So we were pounded with the Democrat talking points that no emails had been hacked and no harm had been done, so just move along here.  I seem to recall security experts at the time opining that there was no way an unsecured server in Bill's bathroom could not have not been hacked by even minimally competent foreign security services, reports that were roundly ridiculed by Democrat sock puppets.  Remember the Dems insisting that it was laughable that the Russians could be in possession of all those emails residing in the Clinton crapper?

But now that we know that WikiLeaks possibly has access to everything that was on that illegal server and is releasing it to the public in its digital version of death by a thousand cuts, what a difference has occurred in the Democrat position.  Suddenly, we are being told by all those same Democrat sock puppets who denied so vehemently that the Russians could conceivably be in possession of Hillary's emails that we can't possibly believe the content of those emails being released by WikiLeaks because the Russians have altered their contents to reflect badly on Clinton because Vladimir Putin is Donald Trump's BFF and is interfering in the American election process on his behalf.

And some of you want to put these disgustingly inconsistent, incompetent, and insidious political thugs in charge of our country?  There's a term for folks like you, too.

Let's see if this old seasoned citizen can get his brain wrapped around this latest bit of liberal lying.

Earlier this year, the Clinton campaign leaders were on every available news forum in the country assuring us that even if Hillary had used her Chappaqua bathroom server to conduct the business of the nation, there was no harm because there was no evidence that anyone had hacked that totally vulnerable repository of state secrets.  All the way back to the Whitewater scandal, we have been hearing that first line of defense from the Clinton's: "There is no evidence."  That has sometimes proved true, because the Clintons long ago surrounded themselves with a picket of legal gunsels who have proved quite adept at burying incriminating documentation and, some would even say, witnesses.

So we were pounded with the Democrat talking points that no emails had been hacked and no harm had been done, so just move along here.  I seem to recall security experts at the time opining that there was no way an unsecured server in Bill's bathroom could not have not been hacked by even minimally competent foreign security services, reports that were roundly ridiculed by Democrat sock puppets.  Remember the Dems insisting that it was laughable that the Russians could be in possession of all those emails residing in the Clinton crapper?

But now that we know that WikiLeaks possibly has access to everything that was on that illegal server and is releasing it to the public in its digital version of death by a thousand cuts, what a difference has occurred in the Democrat position.  Suddenly, we are being told by all those same Democrat sock puppets who denied so vehemently that the Russians could conceivably be in possession of Hillary's emails that we can't possibly believe the content of those emails being released by WikiLeaks because the Russians have altered their contents to reflect badly on Clinton because Vladimir Putin is Donald Trump's BFF and is interfering in the American election process on his behalf.

And some of you want to put these disgustingly inconsistent, incompetent, and insidious political thugs in charge of our country?  There's a term for folks like you, too.