Presidential candidate Gary Johnson recently displayed the major rational and philosophical kink in the libertarian armor.  The former governor of New Mexico was asked if marriage between people of the same sex (SSM) should be legal, and he responded in the affirmative.  But when asked about polygamy, he resorted to the more traditionally consistent libertarian position that it should be a "state issue." But wait a second.  He's okay with SSM not being a state issue?  Should the people have the right to decide such issues via majority vote or not?  Where's the consistency? If one truly seeks smaller government, he will agree that it should have no place defining and redefining marriage.  I never thought a marriage license could be so complicated. Libertarians portray themselves as tolerant and accepting, but remove moral principles –including when it comes to government-sanctioned infanticide – and your political...(Read Full Post)