California Senate refuses to take up bill to prosecute climate change 'deniers'

Despite being approved by two committees, a bill that would have criminalized opposition to climate change died in the California Senate.

The bill would have targeted fossil fuel companies, think-tanks, and individuals who, in the eyes of prosecutors, “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.”

Washington Times:

The measure, which cleared two Senate committees, provided a four-year window in the statute of limitations on violations of the state’s Unfair Competition Law, allowing legal action to be brought until Jan. 1 on charges of climate change “fraud” extending back indefinitely.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” said the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis of the bill.

Leading the fight against the measure was the Civil Justice Association of California, joined by pro-business groups such as the California Chamber of Commerce and the California Business Roundtable.

Justice association President Kim Stone said she was pleased that the state Senate “realized this bill was extreme.”

"Our concern about the bill is that by eliminating the statute of limitations and reviving claims from forever in the past, it’s fundamentally unfair,” said Ms. Stone.

The statute of limitations under the Unfair Competition Law is now four years. As originally introduced, the bill would have allowed climate “fraud” lawsuits extending back 30 years, but later was amended to provide no time limit, she said.

“This bill would be as if the IRS now said that we could audit you for the first year you filed your taxes, or your parents’ taxes, or even for your grandparents’ taxes. Would you have the documentation required to defend yourself if you were accused of having done something wrong?” Ms. Stone said. “No, nobody would have saved their papers because everyone knows the IRS has three years to audit you.”

The measure was introduced amid a national push by Democrats and activist groups to use the legal system to prosecute climate change “fraud,” prompting a backlash from skeptics who have denounced the campaign as an assault on free speech.

A coalition of 17 state attorneys general, including California Attorney General Kamala Harris, have joined forces to pursue climate change skeptics. At least four prosecutors reportedly have launched investigations into Exxon Mobil for climate change “fraud.”

Introduced by state Sen. Ben Allen, Santa Monica Democrat, S.B. 1161 had strong support from environmental groups, led by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The group, which had no immediate comment on the bill’s failure, had argued that the measure was needed to challenge efforts to “confuse consumers and fend off competition from lower-carbon energy sources.”

The chilling effect on science and speech that this sort of legislation leads to is dangerous not only to the First Amendment, but also to the free exchange of information that is so vital to the scientific method.  Science itself is under attack as climate hysterics seek to validate their theories over the dead bodies of their political and scientific opponents and not in the arena of free scientific inquiry.

This is an extremely anti-science outlook on the issue.  It can hardly be called a “debate” when so many reject the notion that there is anything left to discover about global warming – except how really, really bad it’s going to get.  Any information contrary to that implausible position is considered “denial,” and California will not be the last state looking to criminalize and stifle dissent on global warming.

If you experience technical problems, please write to