Muslim migrants in Europe torch own tents to protest one day delay in processing
Tiny Slovenia, with barely 2 million people, is being overrun by Muslims claiming to be refugees and expecting the infidels to provide them services promptly. When Hungary closed its border, Slovenia became the new route to Austria and Germany, but the country has been unable to respond in a way the invaders find acceptable. At least 20,000 Muslims have arrived since Saturday. If the US experienced a similar percentage influx, that would be 3.3 million people arriving and demanding services now. Breitbart reports:
A huge blaze swept through a migrant camp in Slovenia today after angry migrants set fire to their tents in protest at their treatment. Women and children were evacuated from the camp in Brezice, on the border with Croatia, as firefighters battled the fire.
The migrants were reportedly angry at delays in registering them and moving them on to the Austrian border in less than 24-hours, witnesses said.
They also complained about a lack of food, water and blankets, it was reported by the BBC.
Many of those at the camp had arrived in the dark of night after wading or swimming across the Sutla River in temperatures close to freezing. After the fires were extinguished, locals report that other migrants had taken to burning their donated clothes in an effort to keep warm.
Video of the conflagration is arresting:
The argument frequently is made that Europe’s below replacement birthrate requires hosting these Muslims, to keep their social security arrangements viable, and to do the jobs that will go begging. Daniel Greenfield at Front Page Magazine capably demonstrates what an unrealistic fantasy this is in a must-read article. The nub of the argument can seen in this personification of the Europeans as Fritz and the migrant as Mohammed:
Mohammed is Fritz’s retirement plan. But Mohammed has a very different type of plan. Fritz is counting on Mohammed to work while he relaxes. Mohammed relaxes and expects Fritz to work. Fritz is not related to him and therefore Mohammed sees no reason why he should work to support him.
European social democracy reduces society to a giant insurance plan in which money is pooled together. But insurance is forbidden in Islam which considers it to be gambling. European social democracy expects him to bail it out, but to Mohammed, European values are a crime against Islam.
Mohammed’s Imam will tell him to work off the books because paying into the system is gambling. However taking money out of the system is just Jizya; the money non-Muslims are obligated to pay to Muslims. Under Islamic law, it’s better for Mohammed to sell drugs than to pay taxes.
That’s why drug dealing and petty crime are such popular occupations for Salafis in Europe. It’s preferable to steal from infidels than to participate in the great gamble of the European welfare state.
Mohammed isn’t staking his future on the shaky pensions of European socialism. He invests in what social scientists call social capital. He plans his retirement by having a dozen kids. If this lifestyle is subsidized by infidel social services, so much the better. And when social services collapse, those of his kids who aren’t in prison or in ISIS will be there to look after him in his golden years.
As retirement plans go, it’s older and better than the European model.
Mohammed doesn’t worry much about the future. Even if he doesn’t make it past six kids, by the time he’s ready to retire the European country he’s living in will probably be an Islamic State. And he is confident that whatever its arrangements are, they will be better and more just than the infidel system.t
How long will it take European progressives to admit this harsh reality? The fate of Europe hangs in the balance.
Hat tip: Clarice Feldman