US Ebola patient knew he had disease; came to America for treatment

Brietbart is reporting that a Liberian newspaper quotes US Ebola patient Thomas Duncan's boss that he knew he had Ebola and came to America anyway to improve his chances of survival.

In interviews with the Liberian Observer, one of the nation's largest newspapers, both Thomas Eric Duncan's former boss, Henry Brunson, and an unnamed coworker agree that they believe Duncan knew he had Ebola when he boarded a plane out of Monrovia with a final destination in Texas. Brunson noted that, having come into contact with a pregnant woman who died hours after her interaction with Duncan, he knew of his disease. “If he were in Liberia, he was going to surely die,” Brunson told the paper, saying he was "glad" that Duncan was in a country with adequate medical resources.

Duncan worked as a driver for Brunson at the FedEx contractor SafeWay Cargo until mid-September. According to the Observer, Duncan was involved in a car accident at the end of the tenure at the company, and, according to workers, "having acquired an American visa, he did not care and never returned to work afterwards."

Another unnamed source, described as a FedEx worker in Monrovia, told the Observer that Duncan knew he had Ebola, as well. "A source at FedEx in Monrovia said Mr. Duncan apparently knew he was suffering from the disease and that his best chance of survival was reaching to the United States," writes author Omari Jackson, "a position that a family source denied, when we sought confirmation." The Observer notes that the departure to America, for the source and others consulted, appeared a "desperate attempt to survive."

In previous interviews with sources in Monrovia who know Duncan, the Observer found a witness who claimed Duncan had decided to "just go" to America after receiving a visa to visit family in the United States. The decision to leave his job and abruptly go to America raises questions about whether Duncan intended to honor the provisions of his visa and leave the United States in the alloted time.

Duncan's direct knowledge of whether he had the disease is pivotal to understanding how rigorous screening measures at airports in Monrovia are, as well as whether any guilt can be ascribed to Duncan for knowingly violating any procedures in said screening. The Liberian government has announced its intention to prosecute Duncan for having left the country, stating that it has documentation in which Duncan claimed to have never come in contact with anyone carrying the Ebola virus and that such a lie is a criminal infraction.

Don't blame Duncan; blame the US government for its policy of allowing passengers from Liberia to enter the US to begin with. Matthew Continetti asks a question that the government can't answer: "If the FAA can cancel flights to Israel, why can’t it cancel flights to and from the West African countries whence the outbreak originated?"

Nobody argued that cancelling flights to Israel would make the war worse. But that's just what CDC chief Tom Frieden is saying about closing the border to Ebola-afflicted countries:

“The only way we’re going to get to zero risk is by stopping the outbreak at the source” in West Africa, Frieden said.

“Even if we tried to close the border, it wouldn’t work,” the top health official added. “People have a right to return. People transiting through could come in. And it would backfire, because by isolating these countries, it’ll make it harder to help them, it will spread more there and we’d be more likely to be exposed here.”

Have you ever heard such bureaucratic doubletalk in your life? People do not have a "right" to return if they're sick with a deadly disease. That's a no brainer and Frieden is surely lying when he makes that point. Transiting passengers would pose a problem, but not an insurmountable one. And isolating countries that need to be isolated will make it no more difficult to fight the disease than it is now.
What's the real reason for refusing to cut off air travel to these countries? Continetti has an interesting theory:
Simple: because doing so would violate the sacred principles by which our bourgeois liberal elite operate. To deny an individual entry to the United States over fears of contamination would offend our elite’s sense of humanitarian cosmopolitanism. For them, “singling out” nations or cultures from which threats to the public health or safety of the United States originate is illegitimate. It “stigmatizes” those nations or cultures, it “shames” them, it makes them feel unequal. It’s judgmental. It suggests that America prefers her already existing citizens to others.
I'm sure at least some of that is on the money. Listen to Frieden and it appears to be a subtext to what he's saying. We can't appear to be acting in a beastly manner toward black Africans - even if it kills a lot of Americans.
When this is over, there is going to be a reckoning. And the administration's incompetence and myopia are going to be examined and exposed. All we can do now is hope that this stupidity costs as few lives as possible.