The Forest Service wants reporters to pay for the privilege of photographing in national parks

The US Forest Service is finalizing rules that would require reporters and writers who wish to photograph or shoot a video in the vast national park system to purchase a permit.

Ther permits can cost up to $1500.

Not surprisingly, First Amendment watchdogs are up in arms.

The Oregonian:

Under rules being finalized in November, a reporter who met a biologist, wildlife advocate or whistleblower alleging neglect in any of the nation's 100 million acres of wilderness would first need special approval to shoot photos or videos even on an iPhone.

Permits cost up to $1,500, says Forest Service spokesman Larry Chambers, and reporters who don't get a permit could face fines up to $1,000.

First Amendment advocates say the rules ignore press freedoms and are so vague they'd allow the Forest Service to grant permits only to favored reporters shooting videos for positive stories.

"It's pretty clearly unconstitutional," said Gregg Leslie, legal defense director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in Alexandria, Va. "They would have to show an important need to justify these limits, and they just can't."

Liz Close, the Forest Service's acting wilderness director, says the restrictions have been in place on a temporary basis for four years and are meant to preserve the untamed character of the country's wilderness.

Close didn't cite any real-life examples of why the policy is needed or what problems it's addressing. She didn't know whether any media outlets had applied for permits in the last four years.

She said the agency was implementing the Wilderness Act of 1964, which aims to protect wilderness areas from being exploited for commercial gain.

"It's not a problem, it's a responsibility," she said. "We have to follow the statutory requirements."

The Forest Service's previous rules caused a fuss in 2010, when the agency refused to allow an Idaho Public Television crew into a wilderness area to film student conservation workers. The agency ultimately caved to pressure from Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter.

With smartphones blurring the lines between reporters and camera crews, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, said the agency should tread more carefully.

"The Forest Service needs to rethink any policy that subjects noncommercial photographs and recordings to a burdensome permitting process for something as simple as taking a picture with a cell phone," Wyden said. "Especially where reporters and bloggers are concerned, this policy raises troubling questions about inappropriate government limits on activity clearly protected by the First Amendment."

A draconian policy to address a non-existent problem. Sounds like perfect bureaucratic thinking.

In truth, the Forest Service has been operating under a tight budget the last few years so it's not surprising they'd try to pull a stunt like this. But requiring a permit just to take a few photos is reminiscent of the old Soviet Union where you needed a permit for just about everything - including needing a permit to get on a 5 year waiting list for car, or a 3 year waiting list for your own apartment. These little indignities are the mark of petty bureaucrats who seek to control the citizenry.

Looks like the Forest Service has their fair share of those.


If you experience technical problems, please write to