The Libya story must be really bad if Democrats want to relive Iraq & WMDs

Give an A-plus to Senator Paul and Senator McCain for asking good questions. 

Give a C-minus to Senate Democrats praising Sec Clinton and turning the hearing into "we love how much you've traveled for your country" show.

Isn't traveling the world what the Secretary of State is supposed to do?

Give a big F to Senator Durbin and Senator Murphy for "selectively" reminding us about Iraq & WMD's. 

What a shameful performance from these two men!  

The Benghazi story must be really bad if Democrats want to distract the public with "Bush bashing" about the Iraq War.

Why didn't Sen Durbin or Sen Nelson ask Secretary Clinton about her Iraq War vote?  Who lied to her about WMD's?  Was it her husband President Clinton?   As I recall, President bombed Iraq in December '98 because of WMDs?  or what about The Iraq Liberation Act that President Clinton boasted about in '98?

Can we finally get over the "who lied about WMDs" issue?  I don't think that anybody lied. 

Pres Bush made the right decision to take out Saddam Hussein.  He made that decision in the context of 9-11 and I don't remember Senator Durbin going on TV on the night of the invasion saying that anyone lied.

Let's get back to Benghazi, a terrible episode that killed 4 Americans and was followed by an even worse charade of explanations.

I agree with Sec Clinton that we should find out what happened that day rather than look back.  At the same time, it does not help that the Obama administration is not helping us to find what happened that day.

If you experience technical problems, please write to