The no-jihad zone

A mass epidemic of denial seems to have set in at senior levels of the British and American governments. Prime Minister Gordon Brown has notoriously banned the usage of "Muslim" and "terror" together, and is even banning the expression "war on terror."

But Diana West of the Washington Times recounts something even more alarming:
Objecting to a recent column characterizing his views as being non-comprehending or indifferent to jihad, Lt. Col. David Kilcullen, senior counterinsurgency adviser to our forces in Iraq, wondered in an e-mail whether I "may not like Muslims, and that's your choice." It was a long e-mail - one of several - but even these few words convey the viewpoint, increasingly prevalent, that discounts the doctrinal centrality of Islam to jihad violence convulsing the world, from Iraq to London. In the mental no-jihad zone (and, in Lt. Col. Kilcullen's case, despite what he calls his "significant personal body count of terrorists and insurgents killed or captured"), only personal animus can explain alarm over the Islamic institution of jihad (let alone dhimmitude). "Alternatively," he wrote, "you may think Islam contains illiberal and dangerous tendencies."
I am flabbergasted.

Hat tip: Andrew Bostom