We think we know the story: florist Barronelle Stutzman declined a request to design the floral artwork for a gay so-called wedding.  Her position, grounded on the First Amendment, landed her in hot water with the Washington State Supreme Court.  She appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to Washington.  The state Supreme Court sustained the ruling that Stutzman broke the law.  The unfortunate game of hot potato between the courts has left Stutzman no option but to re-appeal to the highest court in the land, as she contends that no creative professional should be required or coerced to create art that violates his core convictions.  The broader principle at stake is whether the courts can coerce creative expression under the guise of protecting LGBT civil rights. The media have mischaracterized Stutzman as a bigot, but in reality, she is fighting for the freedom of creative expression for...(Read Full Article)