Understanding the Tennessee Jihadist
“He died doing what he loved.” No, I am not referring to any one of the five slain U.S. servicemen at the navy reserve center in Chattanooga, Tennessee. I am referring to their killer, Islamic terrorist Mohammed Yusef Abdulaziz. This young jihadist chose the path of conduct declared by Allah in the Koran to be the right one. This righteous path requires the removal of nonbelievers who hinder the advancement of Islam and the establishment of the supremacy of Allah. However, the Obama administration, the FBI, and the mainstream media refuse to call this attack Islamic terrorism.
Abdulaziz fulfilled Islamic law by killing those guilty of the highest crime in Islam, the crime of rejecting Allah and Mohammed. Punishing this treasonous crime is mandated in the Koran, Hadiths (26), and other Islamic-based doctrines such as the Reliance of the Traveller (f1.3), Islam’s most authoritative book on Islamic law and conduct. In Islam, nonbelievers, including the slain U.S. servicemen, are viewed as obstacles in the path of Allah. They are not considered innocent, and therefore require removal. Killing them, or waging jihad, is therefore justified as an act of defense against those who are hindering the rule of Allah.
Abdulaziz knew he would be guaranteed a high place (4645) in Paradise for waging jihad and defending Islam, and a higher place if he were to die while fighting. However, waging jihad goes well beyond mere justification. Waging jihad is a deeply-entrenched duty and commandment from Allah to subjugate non-Muslims worldwide to Islamic rule so that only the rule of Allah prevails. This is what lies at the heart of not radical Islam, but Islam itself. Scholars of Islamic law would agree with this.
The attacks at the U.S. military facilities on the last day of Ramadan, the Islamic month rife with jihad right from Islam’s inception, were clearly inspired by the same jihad ideology of the Koran. It was this ideology that inspired Mohammed and his followers to commit genocide against all Jewish tribes living in Saudi Arabia. It was this ideology that inspired religious Muslims to commit genocide against the Hindus, killing tens of millions over an 800-year period, and the Christian Armenians, killing up to 1.5 million. Today this very same ideology continues to inspire tens of thousands of Muslims, like Mohammed Yusef Abdulaziz, to kill non-Muslims, as well as Muslims who are not Muslim enough, on a daily basis worldwide.
It is this jihad ideology that inspired Mohammed and his followers to commit genocide against all Jewish tribes living in Saudi Arabia. It was this ideology that inspired religious Muslims to commit genocide against the Hindus, killing tens of millions over an 800-year period, and the Christian Armenians, killing up to 1.5 million. Today this very same ideology continues to inspire tens of thousands of Muslims, like Mohammed Yusef Abdulaziz, to kill non-Muslims, as well as Muslims who are not Muslim enough, on a daily basis worldwide.
However, federal, state and local U.S. law enforcement agencies (headed by the FBI) and news pundits cannot get their heads around this recent attack, and are still trying to figure out what could have possibly driven this young Muslim man to target unarmed innocent men and women. What these investigators do not understand is that the gunman did not view his victims as innocent. In Islam, there is no such thing an as innocent non-Muslim. The meaning of innocence and other terms (such as justice and freedom) used in Islamic law and in Islam’s holy texts do not mean anything like the accepted Western meaning.
The Islamic threat to kill Westerners does not simply “come from the internet, come out of Syria, from ISIS followers, ISIS recruiters, ISIS operators,” as Michael McCaul, Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, explained. This threat stems from the totalitarian ideology of Islam itself. During the Cold War, Americans perceived the totalitarian and supremacist ideology of communism as a viable threat to their hard-won freedoms, and they reacted accordingly.
Why won’t the U.S. administration see the recent killing spree as one motivated by the totalitarian and supremacist ideology of Islam, an ideology that poses not only a threat to the U.S., but the greatest threat to Western freedom, equality, and the human race? It is precisely this ignorance that Islam is counting on in order to subjugate Western civilization to sharia law.
The FBI and the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security (HCHS), both U.S. federal law enforcement agencies, refuse to use the terms Islamic terrorism or jihad to define and better understand the shooter, thanks to the Obama administration. In 2011, President Obama issued the removal of any words linking Islam to terrorism from government documents (that include law enforcement and national security training manuals) -- words that Muslim Brotherhood front groups, such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), claimed were offensive. Any material that does not portray Islam as a religion of peace was discarded.
Working with the Muslim Brotherhood to control how Islam is discussed in society and how government handles policy so that it veers towards sharia law, is the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC). This organization is the most influential and largest Muslim organization in the world, dedicated to the imposition of sharia law worldwide. The OIC is relentlessly pushing to internationally outlaw and criminalize any criticism of Islam, regardless of whether or not that criticism is true. The OIC’s influence is so pervasive that in some European countries, telling the truth about Islam has become a crime.
The U.S. under President Obama is heading in the same direction. In his National Intelligence Strategy of the United States issued in 2009, the terms Islam, Muslim and jihad were never, not even once, used. The OIC’s widespread influence also explains why Obama refuses to call the Islamic State Islamic, despite the fact that Islamic State is what ISIS named itself and its state.
The OIC’s influence has trickled down to U.S. law enforcement agencies. They deny that Abdelaziz was driven by Islam despite jihadists saying the contrary, and posit that the shootings may have been a result of none other than depression. If the enemy and his accompanying motivational ideology cannot be identified and understood in terms that define him -- because those terms were purged from the American, and European, lexicon -- then how can he be defeated?
Meanwhile, as the FBI and HCHS continue their futile search for the mysterious motives of the Tennessee jihadist, hemming and hawing their way through semantics on whether or not this recent attack was ISIS-inspired, other jihadists are busy plotting more terrorist attacks against the West.
The deceptive use of Western terminology by Muslim organizations, as well as the outlawing of truth about Islam and jihad by the Obama administration, is misleading American citizens and lulling them into ignorant complacency about the threat from Islam. Until Americans take the time to educate themselves about Islamic law in order to recognize and identify the real threat -- instead of enable it, as their government is doing -- the U.S. will, once again, remain impotent in the face of an Islamic onslaught in the homeland.