![]() Return to the Article |
A "reluctance to attack" indeed. McCain is confusing criticizing the record and plans of his opponent with "smears" - something the Obama campaign has taken full advantage of. Every time McCain has tried to draw a distinction between himself and Obama, some surrogate for the Democrats accuses McCain of dirty politics. At that point, McCain tones down his rhetoric and the attack turns to mush.
Here is where the problem is: We had a nomination gap between when McCain was nominated and the Democratic race completed," a swing state Republican Party chairman said. "I think [campaign manager] Rick Davis and his team did not have an understanding of how the grass-roots, organizational part of the party works. They did not use what the [Republican National Committee] had done, or how groups like the [National Rifle Association] could have helped the McCain campaign locally.
"They are just now opening up campaign operations in most states. The RNC was ready to go in most states in March," the state chairman continued, listing off grievances ranging from the campaign's "dictating" the members of various RNC committees to the state party's having been "threatened" that, though McCain "couldn't afford not to play in our state," the campaign would not "recommend us for resources" if the state party did not abide by its requests.
One frequent criticism surrounds the widely held perception that the campaign has failed to define or convey a consistent narrative against Obama - something that many Republicans insist should have begun right after Obama captured the nomination.
"What's the political strategy when you allow your opponent, who has just had a grueling four months, time to catch their breath, regroup, fundraise and start to define himself?" asked a Republican strategist who helped lead a past presidential campaign. "It's politics 101."
Several consultants from past GOP campaigns were even more frustrated by what they viewed as a reluctance to attack - textbook strategy for an underdog.