![]() Return to the Article |
"I don't mind taking hits on my record on issues, but when somebody starts throwing mud, at least we can hope that it's both accurate and right out of the Republican playbook," she said.What propels these statements beyond irony is, of course, the fact that the Clinton political machine has attempted destroy so many over the years that their tactics have become legendary. For the Senator from New York to complain about the tactics of her rivals, much less compare them to Republican attacks, is almost beyond belief.
"For him to be throwing this mud and making these charges I think really detracts from what we're trying to do here tonight. We need to put forth a positive agenda for America."
Obama showed his inexperience at debating. When Clinton hit him early on health care, Obama simply defended himself from the attack, rather than deflect the attack and hit back at her over the '93 health care reform failure. It was an easy hit for him, and he missed; he didn't even swing; got caught looking. Clinton is winning on "experience," not because of the practical experience she has as a former chief executive (she's never been one) but the experience she has as a politician, as a debater. Clinton would not have missed a similar opening.Does this performance get Hillary back on track? Almost certainly, although Iowa will still probably be a struggle for her since Obama is now flexing his media muscles and saturating the airwaves with a media blitz. It is generally conceded that if either Obama or Edwards can knock Hillary off in Iowa, her cloak of invincibility and inevitability will be tarnished and anything becomes possible in later primaries - even ones where Clinton currently enjoys a huge lead.