On July 20,1993, the LA Times, via Ronald J. Ostrow and Robert L. Jackson, reported that Bill Clinton by his attorney general, Janet Reno, fired FBI director Sessions because:

The Justice Department report found, among other things, that Sessions had engaged in a sham transaction to avoid paying taxes on his use of an FBI limousine to take him to and from work, that he had billed the government for a security fence around his home that provided no security and that he had arranged business trips to places where he could meet with relatives[.]

Reno said:

I have concluded that the director has exhibited a serious deficiency in judgment involving matters contained in the report and that he does not command the respect and confidence needed to lead the bureau and the law enforcement community in addressing the many issues facing law enforcement today[.]

There is no question that Hillary lied about turning over to the State Department all her work-related emails, she lied that she never used her private email system for classified documents, she lied about the number of computers and phones she used, she lied about not knowing the meaning of "C" on the emails, and she used a program called BleachBit to erase emails so they cannot be retrieved.

Hillary used her State Department position to have contributions made to the Clinton Foundation, and coincidentally, Bill's speaking fees and speaking gigs increased.  The contributions and speaking fees make Sessions not paying taxes on use of a limo to work, a security fence around his house, and business trips where he could meet with relatives seem trivial in comparison.

If we apply the standard applied by Bill Clinton to Sessions "about a serious deficiency in judgment" to the facts found by FBI director James Comey in his July 2016 report, and the pay for play scandal, then Hillary would not be fit to head the FBI, or any law enforcement agency or office.

 If Hillary is not fit to run the FBI, then how can she be fit to be president?