Cuban state media goes after our first black president

President Teddy Roosevelt once told a campaign audience that weakness invites contempt.  Let's just say that those words apply to our new friend Raúl Castro, who keeps going out of his way to show the world that it was President Obama, not he, who really wanted to do the wave at the baseball game.

First, Raúl Castro skipped President Obama's arrival.  We heard all week that it was the first presidential visit to Cuba since President Coolidge.  Historic?  I guess that Raúl didn't get the memo or doesn't care about history.  

Second, Raúl Castro watched  the president of the U.S. praise his education and health care system.  Incredibly, President Obama read the regime's talking points from A to Z.  What was the point of President Obama doing this? 

Third, Fidel Castro jumped into the act and wrote an op-ed in the state media blasting President Obama.  Let's call that column "Don't meddle in Cuba, or I will shoot one of those Soviet missiles against your plane as I did in the missile crisis!"

Finally, the state-run media (La Tribuna de la Habana) hit one right over the Rays' centerfielder head with an attack on President Obama that would have a lot of Democrats screaming "racista":

The Havana Tribune, a state-controlled Cuban newspaper, has added insult to injury following Fidel Castro’s scathing criticism of President Barack Obama upon his departure from the island. In an editorial, the title of which refers to President Obama as “negro,” an opinion columnist has accused him of “inciting rebellion.”

The article is titled “Negro, ¿Tu Eres Sueco?” which roughly translates to “Black Man, Are You Dumb?” (The idiom “pretend to be a Swede” means to play dumb, hence the title is literally asking, “Are you Swedish?”) The author, who is black, goes on to condemn President Obama for meeting with Cuban pro-democracy activists and “subtly” suggesting that the Cuban Revolution needed to change. “Obama came, saw, but unfortunately, with the pretend gesture of lending a hand, tried to conquer,” Elias Argudín writes.

“[Obama] chose to criticize and subtly suggest… incitations to rebellion and disorder, without caring that he was on foreign ground. Without a doubt, Obama overplayed his hand,” he continues. “The least I can say is, Virulo-style: ‘Negro, are you dumb?'”

Virulo is a white pro-Revolution comedian.

I would add a couple of things:

1) The slang "negro tu eres sueco" is a clear suggestion that Obama is not black.  What skin color are Swedish people?  I would translate it to the Cuban equivalent of calling Obama an Oreo cookie – i.e. black outside and white inside.

2) No one takes a cheap shot like that against President Obama without the editorial consent of Fidel or Raúl Castro.  This is the worst thing that I've heard about a U.S. president in years, especially the one they negotiated with.

So what's going on?

Maybe Fidel Castro was angry that President Obama did not salute him, and he pulled a few strings at the state-run media.

Maybe Raúl Castro is showing Cubans, and the Latin American left, that he is the one in charge.

Time will tell, but one thing is clear to me.  We can add Raúl Castro to the growing list of world leaders who have zero respect for President Obama.   

"Hope and change" took a fastball between the eyes this week!

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

President Teddy Roosevelt once told a campaign audience that weakness invites contempt.  Let's just say that those words apply to our new friend Raúl Castro, who keeps going out of his way to show the world that it was President Obama, not he, who really wanted to do the wave at the baseball game.

First, Raúl Castro skipped President Obama's arrival.  We heard all week that it was the first presidential visit to Cuba since President Coolidge.  Historic?  I guess that Raúl didn't get the memo or doesn't care about history.  

Second, Raúl Castro watched  the president of the U.S. praise his education and health care system.  Incredibly, President Obama read the regime's talking points from A to Z.  What was the point of President Obama doing this? 

Third, Fidel Castro jumped into the act and wrote an op-ed in the state media blasting President Obama.  Let's call that column "Don't meddle in Cuba, or I will shoot one of those Soviet missiles against your plane as I did in the missile crisis!"

Finally, the state-run media (La Tribuna de la Habana) hit one right over the Rays' centerfielder head with an attack on President Obama that would have a lot of Democrats screaming "racista":

The Havana Tribune, a state-controlled Cuban newspaper, has added insult to injury following Fidel Castro’s scathing criticism of President Barack Obama upon his departure from the island. In an editorial, the title of which refers to President Obama as “negro,” an opinion columnist has accused him of “inciting rebellion.”

The article is titled “Negro, ¿Tu Eres Sueco?” which roughly translates to “Black Man, Are You Dumb?” (The idiom “pretend to be a Swede” means to play dumb, hence the title is literally asking, “Are you Swedish?”) The author, who is black, goes on to condemn President Obama for meeting with Cuban pro-democracy activists and “subtly” suggesting that the Cuban Revolution needed to change. “Obama came, saw, but unfortunately, with the pretend gesture of lending a hand, tried to conquer,” Elias Argudín writes.

“[Obama] chose to criticize and subtly suggest… incitations to rebellion and disorder, without caring that he was on foreign ground. Without a doubt, Obama overplayed his hand,” he continues. “The least I can say is, Virulo-style: ‘Negro, are you dumb?'”

Virulo is a white pro-Revolution comedian.

I would add a couple of things:

1) The slang "negro tu eres sueco" is a clear suggestion that Obama is not black.  What skin color are Swedish people?  I would translate it to the Cuban equivalent of calling Obama an Oreo cookie – i.e. black outside and white inside.

2) No one takes a cheap shot like that against President Obama without the editorial consent of Fidel or Raúl Castro.  This is the worst thing that I've heard about a U.S. president in years, especially the one they negotiated with.

So what's going on?

Maybe Fidel Castro was angry that President Obama did not salute him, and he pulled a few strings at the state-run media.

Maybe Raúl Castro is showing Cubans, and the Latin American left, that he is the one in charge.

Time will tell, but one thing is clear to me.  We can add Raúl Castro to the growing list of world leaders who have zero respect for President Obama.   

"Hope and change" took a fastball between the eyes this week!

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.