Muslims and the power of numbers, large and small

Taking in Muslims from any country for any reason is always risky business. It has been well established that it doesn’t take a lot of Muslims to smother freedom and extinguish vibrant societies.

Peter Hammond wrote an exceptional analysis of this in his book Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam, where he showed the direct correlation between the percentage of Muslims in a nation and increasing levels of violence and forced adherence to Sharia Law.

In addition to Hammond’s meticulous research that shows how a small percentage of Muslims can transform whole nations (and not for the better), it is also illuminating to delve into the numbers on other levels.

Daniel Greenfield, writing for Front Page Magazine, wrote a sobering piece that analyzed the current invasion of Muslims in Germany. Greenfield points out that although the 800,000 migrants Germany is taking in this year amount to 1% of Germany’s total population of 80 million, the implications are greater than the small percentage suggests. The key issue is the rapidly growing population of young Muslim males. Here are a few stats:

  • 27 million Germans are over the age of 55
  • of the 5 million Muslims already living in Germany, 2 million are under the age of 30 (which is several years younger than the average age of non-Muslim Germans)
  • the majority of Muslim migrants are young males between the ages of 15 and 24
  • the number of non-Muslim Germans in the same demographic is just 4.3 million

In other words, one-third of Germany’s population is over the age of 55 while 40% of German Muslims are under the age of 30. Meanwhile, most Muslims now coming to Germany are young males compared to non-Muslim Germans in the same demographic group comprising just 5% of Germany’s population.

The result?

According to Greenfield’s calculations, the (conservative) percentage of young Muslim males in Germany will soon reach 10%.

Now let’s go back to Hammond’s research which shows that when the Muslim population of a country reaches 10% (and the significance will be higher in Germany because we’re focusing only on Muslim males), there are increased threats of violence and actual violence, including arson, riots, and murder. At 20% Hammond notes (based on real-world models) that rioting and murder become increasingly commonplace, jihad militias are formed, and churches and synagogues are burned.

Now add into the mix that Muslim families tend to be larger than non-Muslim families in Europe (as well as in the United States) which means that the Muslim population grows at a faster rate than the non-Muslim population.

So Obama and the left (with much of the right foolishly following along with McCain and Graham leading the charge), want to bring 10,000 more “Syrian refugees” to the United States. And you can be sure the number will climb well beyond that.

Robert Spencer writes:

The Reuters headline was “Obama wants U.S. to prepare for 10,000 Syrian refugees next year: White House.”

Prepare? How can we prepare? Bomb shelters? Underground bunkers? Metal detectors at shopping malls? Funeral arrangements? Exactly what preparations does the President expect us to make? (snip)

…last February, the Islamic State promised to flood Europe in the near future with as many as 500,000 refugees. That future is upon us, and it is important to note that the Islamic State was not simply talking about engulfing the continent in a humanitarian crisis that would strain its resources to the breaking point. The jihadis were also planning to cross into Europe among those refugees, and now they’re boasting that they have done so.

An Islamic State operative boasted last week that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic State jihadis had entered Europe. “They are going like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he smiled and said, “Just wait.” He explained: “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.”

And now Barack Obama is bringing 10,000 of these refugees to the United States. How many Islamic State jihadis will be among them? No one can say, but what jihadi would pass up a chance to go to the Great Satan itself, and win his share of virgins by destroying an American landmark or mass murdering American infidels wholesale?

We have nothing to gain by importing more Muslims and everything (quite literally) to lose.

So let’s not do it.

And as long as we’re speaking of numbers and our survival, Muslim invaders rely heavily on public benefits. Breitbart reports on some shocking numbers that showed that more than 90% of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps and nearly 70 percent receive cash assistance. Stats from 2013 showed the following breakdown for Middle Eastern refugees:

  • 91% received food stamps
  • 73% on Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance
  • 68% on cash welfare
  • 36% received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
  • 32% received Supplemental Security Income
  • 19% lived in public housing
  • 17% were on General Assistance
  • 10% received Refugee Cash Assistance

In other words, like Europe we are importing people who will drain money from the public fisc, many of whom will never assimilate, many of whom hate us, and enough of whom will do us harm or cheer on those who do.

The sooner we stop this insanity, the sooner we can go about the business of building back our once great nation – a nation that needs not one more Muslim immigrant. We’ve already got enough on our hands to deal with.

Taking in Muslims from any country for any reason is always risky business. It has been well established that it doesn’t take a lot of Muslims to smother freedom and extinguish vibrant societies.

Peter Hammond wrote an exceptional analysis of this in his book Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam, where he showed the direct correlation between the percentage of Muslims in a nation and increasing levels of violence and forced adherence to Sharia Law.

In addition to Hammond’s meticulous research that shows how a small percentage of Muslims can transform whole nations (and not for the better), it is also illuminating to delve into the numbers on other levels.

Daniel Greenfield, writing for Front Page Magazine, wrote a sobering piece that analyzed the current invasion of Muslims in Germany. Greenfield points out that although the 800,000 migrants Germany is taking in this year amount to 1% of Germany’s total population of 80 million, the implications are greater than the small percentage suggests. The key issue is the rapidly growing population of young Muslim males. Here are a few stats:

  • 27 million Germans are over the age of 55
  • of the 5 million Muslims already living in Germany, 2 million are under the age of 30 (which is several years younger than the average age of non-Muslim Germans)
  • the majority of Muslim migrants are young males between the ages of 15 and 24
  • the number of non-Muslim Germans in the same demographic is just 4.3 million

In other words, one-third of Germany’s population is over the age of 55 while 40% of German Muslims are under the age of 30. Meanwhile, most Muslims now coming to Germany are young males compared to non-Muslim Germans in the same demographic group comprising just 5% of Germany’s population.

The result?

According to Greenfield’s calculations, the (conservative) percentage of young Muslim males in Germany will soon reach 10%.

Now let’s go back to Hammond’s research which shows that when the Muslim population of a country reaches 10% (and the significance will be higher in Germany because we’re focusing only on Muslim males), there are increased threats of violence and actual violence, including arson, riots, and murder. At 20% Hammond notes (based on real-world models) that rioting and murder become increasingly commonplace, jihad militias are formed, and churches and synagogues are burned.

Now add into the mix that Muslim families tend to be larger than non-Muslim families in Europe (as well as in the United States) which means that the Muslim population grows at a faster rate than the non-Muslim population.

So Obama and the left (with much of the right foolishly following along with McCain and Graham leading the charge), want to bring 10,000 more “Syrian refugees” to the United States. And you can be sure the number will climb well beyond that.

Robert Spencer writes:

The Reuters headline was “Obama wants U.S. to prepare for 10,000 Syrian refugees next year: White House.”

Prepare? How can we prepare? Bomb shelters? Underground bunkers? Metal detectors at shopping malls? Funeral arrangements? Exactly what preparations does the President expect us to make? (snip)

…last February, the Islamic State promised to flood Europe in the near future with as many as 500,000 refugees. That future is upon us, and it is important to note that the Islamic State was not simply talking about engulfing the continent in a humanitarian crisis that would strain its resources to the breaking point. The jihadis were also planning to cross into Europe among those refugees, and now they’re boasting that they have done so.

An Islamic State operative boasted last week that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic State jihadis had entered Europe. “They are going like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he smiled and said, “Just wait.” He explained: “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.”

And now Barack Obama is bringing 10,000 of these refugees to the United States. How many Islamic State jihadis will be among them? No one can say, but what jihadi would pass up a chance to go to the Great Satan itself, and win his share of virgins by destroying an American landmark or mass murdering American infidels wholesale?

We have nothing to gain by importing more Muslims and everything (quite literally) to lose.

So let’s not do it.

And as long as we’re speaking of numbers and our survival, Muslim invaders rely heavily on public benefits. Breitbart reports on some shocking numbers that showed that more than 90% of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps and nearly 70 percent receive cash assistance. Stats from 2013 showed the following breakdown for Middle Eastern refugees:

  • 91% received food stamps
  • 73% on Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance
  • 68% on cash welfare
  • 36% received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
  • 32% received Supplemental Security Income
  • 19% lived in public housing
  • 17% were on General Assistance
  • 10% received Refugee Cash Assistance

In other words, like Europe we are importing people who will drain money from the public fisc, many of whom will never assimilate, many of whom hate us, and enough of whom will do us harm or cheer on those who do.

The sooner we stop this insanity, the sooner we can go about the business of building back our once great nation – a nation that needs not one more Muslim immigrant. We’ve already got enough on our hands to deal with.