In an effort to stoke animosity between the sexes, the liberal media look for two kinds of articles: (1) articles that purport to show women being discriminated against and (2) articles that show women as superior to men.  But even exerting all their efforts to produce propaganda day after day, there is only so much they can find to write about.  So they look to turn any article into a story about sex (or race, or sexual orientation). Like black goo dripping out of a Ghostbusters ghost trap, this insidious bias has infiltrated what should be the purely science section of the New York Times, leading to a breathless announcement on the NYT homepage that female chimpanzees are seriously underrated. Studies of hunters and gatherers — and of chimpanzees, which are often used as stand-ins for human ancestors — have cast bigger, faster and more powerful males in the hunter role. Sexist researchers!  Or sexist chimps.  Or both! Now, a 10-year...(Read Full Post)