Dennis Kucinich in 2016?

As reported here, former Ohio congressman, Cleveland mayor, and presidential candidate Dennis J. Kucinich sent a letter on 30 July 2014 to unnamed “former congressional colleagues,” most likely Democrats.  Here is the text:

Dear Colleague,

As someone who through 16 years in the House served with most current members of Congress, I urge you to help end the grave humanitarian crisis of death and destruction, which is threatening the lives of 1.8 million Gazans with collective punishment, and which seriously damages the long-term security of Israel, while undermining its reputation in the world community.

In 2006, Congress passed S. 2370, which in Section 9 established conditions which Hamas must meet in order for the US to negotiate with it:

(1) Recognize Israel's right to exist.

(2) Renounce aggression.

(3) Dismantle the infrastructure used to carry out attacks against Israel.

(4) Accept previous agreements between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

A new Palestinian national unity government, announced on June 2, 2014, accepted those identical conditions. However, ambiguity about Hamas' role in the new unity government has led the media and some members of Congress to assume that the United States remains barred from negotiation with Hamas.

Meanwhile, the Israeli government and Hamas are at an impasse over Hamas' status. Hamas is the democratically elected, legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. Failure to accept the election which brought Hamas to leadership closes a path toward resolution of the current crisis and violates the civil and political rights of Palestinians, who are protected by international law, to elect the representatives of their choice.

In Gaza, civilian deaths in a situation of apartheid occupation, characterized by complete power asymmetry, can be described as a crime against humanity. As of today, over 1,262 Palestinians, and three Israelis have lost their lives. More than 240 Palestinian children have been killed. In the early hours of this morning, while a ceasefire was being negotiated, Israel hit a UN girls' school, killing 20 refugees.

The US, given its longstanding support of Israel and its $3.2 billion annual aid ($8.5 million per day, $114 billion since 1949), including provision of military weapons, is in a singular position to put an end to the slaughter through openly entering into negotiations with Hamas.

Congress must clarify S.2370, Section 9, amending it to direct the Administration to enter into such negotiations with Hamas, as to assure recognition of Israel's right to exist, renunciation of aggression and those other concerns which Congress has delineated in its legislative enactments.

Any negotiations must countenance, among other essential points, the concerns of Palestinians that Israel equally recognize the Palestinians' right to exist and to live free of forced poverty and ill health; end the occupation; stop the blockade; end the boycott; cease the illegal settlement building and secure Palestinian rights to their own land and to their natural resources such as water and natural gas supplies.

If the US is prevented by law from negotiating with Hamas, or fails to intervene to secure Palestinian rights, or stands by as the Israeli government escalates the killing of thousands more Palestinians, the conflict and its consequences may soon beyond our ability to control. There is a need for a breakthrough.

Congress must step up and take a leadership role to prevent further harm to innocent Palestinians and Israelis. In his 1961 Inaugural Address, President John F. Kennedy said, "Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate."

At this critical moment in world history, America must have the ability and the willingness to negotiate in service of the cause of peace and security, for our allies and their neighbors. The US can and must directly mediate an end to this violence.

I urge you to amend S. 2370, Section 9, and any other legislation which restricts our nation's ability to negotiate a peaceful resolution.

Sincerely,

Dennis J. Kucinich

Member of Congress 1997-2013

Does Kucinich really believe that Speaker Boehner would entertain even the possibility of amending S. 2370, effectively stabbing Israel in the back by allowing the Obama administration to negotiate with Hamas terrorists?  Well, let’s suppose that Kucinich is neither stupid nor delusional and try to figure out what’s going on here.  My take: he’s getting ready to throw his hat into the ring for the third time in 2016.

As he looks around and sees how badly Hillary Clinton has stumbled so far – a book that flopped, one gaffe after another, a thoroughly unlikable personality – Kucinich sees himself as a viable alternative.  Why not?  His letter preaches just the sort of sermon the Democratic Party mainstream wants to hear.  His pacifist credentials will endear him to the left: Kucinich voted against the Iraq War, unlike Clinton.  He brought articles of impeachment against President Bush and Vice President Cheney.  The fact that Kucinich joined Fox News Channel as a regular contributor in 2013 may actually be a plus, showing he can mix it up with conservatives and would be less of a polarizing figure than either Clinton or Obama.  Let’s not forget a beautiful and stylish wife 30 years younger!

It’s far too early to conclude that Democrats are looking elsewhere for ‘16.  Right now Kucinich is the kid in the back row with his hand up, trying to divert attention away from the teacher’s pet, the frumpy little girl in the front row.

As reported here, former Ohio congressman, Cleveland mayor, and presidential candidate Dennis J. Kucinich sent a letter on 30 July 2014 to unnamed “former congressional colleagues,” most likely Democrats.  Here is the text:

Dear Colleague,

As someone who through 16 years in the House served with most current members of Congress, I urge you to help end the grave humanitarian crisis of death and destruction, which is threatening the lives of 1.8 million Gazans with collective punishment, and which seriously damages the long-term security of Israel, while undermining its reputation in the world community.

In 2006, Congress passed S. 2370, which in Section 9 established conditions which Hamas must meet in order for the US to negotiate with it:

(1) Recognize Israel's right to exist.

(2) Renounce aggression.

(3) Dismantle the infrastructure used to carry out attacks against Israel.

(4) Accept previous agreements between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

A new Palestinian national unity government, announced on June 2, 2014, accepted those identical conditions. However, ambiguity about Hamas' role in the new unity government has led the media and some members of Congress to assume that the United States remains barred from negotiation with Hamas.

Meanwhile, the Israeli government and Hamas are at an impasse over Hamas' status. Hamas is the democratically elected, legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. Failure to accept the election which brought Hamas to leadership closes a path toward resolution of the current crisis and violates the civil and political rights of Palestinians, who are protected by international law, to elect the representatives of their choice.

In Gaza, civilian deaths in a situation of apartheid occupation, characterized by complete power asymmetry, can be described as a crime against humanity. As of today, over 1,262 Palestinians, and three Israelis have lost their lives. More than 240 Palestinian children have been killed. In the early hours of this morning, while a ceasefire was being negotiated, Israel hit a UN girls' school, killing 20 refugees.

The US, given its longstanding support of Israel and its $3.2 billion annual aid ($8.5 million per day, $114 billion since 1949), including provision of military weapons, is in a singular position to put an end to the slaughter through openly entering into negotiations with Hamas.

Congress must clarify S.2370, Section 9, amending it to direct the Administration to enter into such negotiations with Hamas, as to assure recognition of Israel's right to exist, renunciation of aggression and those other concerns which Congress has delineated in its legislative enactments.

Any negotiations must countenance, among other essential points, the concerns of Palestinians that Israel equally recognize the Palestinians' right to exist and to live free of forced poverty and ill health; end the occupation; stop the blockade; end the boycott; cease the illegal settlement building and secure Palestinian rights to their own land and to their natural resources such as water and natural gas supplies.

If the US is prevented by law from negotiating with Hamas, or fails to intervene to secure Palestinian rights, or stands by as the Israeli government escalates the killing of thousands more Palestinians, the conflict and its consequences may soon beyond our ability to control. There is a need for a breakthrough.

Congress must step up and take a leadership role to prevent further harm to innocent Palestinians and Israelis. In his 1961 Inaugural Address, President John F. Kennedy said, "Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate."

At this critical moment in world history, America must have the ability and the willingness to negotiate in service of the cause of peace and security, for our allies and their neighbors. The US can and must directly mediate an end to this violence.

I urge you to amend S. 2370, Section 9, and any other legislation which restricts our nation's ability to negotiate a peaceful resolution.

Sincerely,

Dennis J. Kucinich

Member of Congress 1997-2013

Does Kucinich really believe that Speaker Boehner would entertain even the possibility of amending S. 2370, effectively stabbing Israel in the back by allowing the Obama administration to negotiate with Hamas terrorists?  Well, let’s suppose that Kucinich is neither stupid nor delusional and try to figure out what’s going on here.  My take: he’s getting ready to throw his hat into the ring for the third time in 2016.

As he looks around and sees how badly Hillary Clinton has stumbled so far – a book that flopped, one gaffe after another, a thoroughly unlikable personality – Kucinich sees himself as a viable alternative.  Why not?  His letter preaches just the sort of sermon the Democratic Party mainstream wants to hear.  His pacifist credentials will endear him to the left: Kucinich voted against the Iraq War, unlike Clinton.  He brought articles of impeachment against President Bush and Vice President Cheney.  The fact that Kucinich joined Fox News Channel as a regular contributor in 2013 may actually be a plus, showing he can mix it up with conservatives and would be less of a polarizing figure than either Clinton or Obama.  Let’s not forget a beautiful and stylish wife 30 years younger!

It’s far too early to conclude that Democrats are looking elsewhere for ‘16.  Right now Kucinich is the kid in the back row with his hand up, trying to divert attention away from the teacher’s pet, the frumpy little girl in the front row.