Quality of decision striking down VA gay marriage ban questioned

This is one big goof by the federal judge that overturned the Virginia gay marriage ban.

Judge Allenda L. Wright Allen appeared to confuse the Declaration of Indendence with the Constitution in the written opinion.

Daily Caller:

Both federal judge Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and the one-time newspaper of record confused the Constitution for the Declaration of Independence during their haste to celebrate the overturning of Virginia's gay marriage ban Thursday night.

"Our Constitution declares that 'all men' are created equal. Surely this means all of us," wrote Allen in a tautological pronouncement that cited a unilateral assertion of sovereignty penned in response to 18th-century British abuses of power, rather than the supreme law governing the U.S.

The New York Times gave no indication it noticed Allen's glaring error, dedicating most of its 761-word article to sniffing at opponents of same-sex marriage.

"[S]o far, the justices have not decided the basic issue raised by the new decision in Virginia and similar recent decisions by federal district courts in Utah and Oklahoma: whether any sound constitutional reason exists for a state to deny gay and lesbian couples an equal right to marry," reporter Erik Eckholm wrote, who declined to mention whether the Declaration of Independence gave gay and lesbian couples an automatic legal right to marry.

Shockingly ignorant. There may not be a constitutional reason for a state to ban gay marriage, but the issue isn't going to be decided by citing the Declaration.





This is one big goof by the federal judge that overturned the Virginia gay marriage ban.

Judge Allenda L. Wright Allen appeared to confuse the Declaration of Indendence with the Constitution in the written opinion.

Daily Caller:

Both federal judge Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and the one-time newspaper of record confused the Constitution for the Declaration of Independence during their haste to celebrate the overturning of Virginia's gay marriage ban Thursday night.

"Our Constitution declares that 'all men' are created equal. Surely this means all of us," wrote Allen in a tautological pronouncement that cited a unilateral assertion of sovereignty penned in response to 18th-century British abuses of power, rather than the supreme law governing the U.S.

The New York Times gave no indication it noticed Allen's glaring error, dedicating most of its 761-word article to sniffing at opponents of same-sex marriage.

"[S]o far, the justices have not decided the basic issue raised by the new decision in Virginia and similar recent decisions by federal district courts in Utah and Oklahoma: whether any sound constitutional reason exists for a state to deny gay and lesbian couples an equal right to marry," reporter Erik Eckholm wrote, who declined to mention whether the Declaration of Independence gave gay and lesbian couples an automatic legal right to marry.

Shockingly ignorant. There may not be a constitutional reason for a state to ban gay marriage, but the issue isn't going to be decided by citing the Declaration.





RECENT VIDEOS