« Chicago Tribune: 'the most puzzling, and potentially disastrous, week of the Obama presidency' | Senate Dems will alter Syria force authorization bill »
September 2, 2013
Abrams: US foreign policy in 'shambles'
An excellent op-ed in Politico by State Department vet Elliot Abrams on Obama's "unintelligible" Syria policy: In March 2011, President Obama committed the United States to action in Libya that involved roughly 100 cruise missile firings, 12 U.S. Navy ships in the Mediterranean, and 75 U.S. Air Force and Navy aircraft including B-2 bombers. And the Libyan case involved no use of chemical warfare by Muammar Qadhafi. Still, the president saw no reason to seek a congressional vote. This context makes his claim that he must seek a vote now, in the Syrian case, unintelligible. It cannot be a matter of principle, or the principle would have applied to intervention in Libya as well. From all appearances, the president either lost his nerve, or more likely read opinion polls suggesting that intervention would be widely unpopular. He came to this decision abruptly, after sending out his new secretary of state to make two powerful, emotional, and affecting war speeches that...(Read Full Post)