« A word about Eydie Gorme |
| Donald 'Birther' Trump Is Back! »
Iran's nuclear shot in the arm
The Obama Administration has actively pursued a Progressive crusade to shred the Constitution, disarm the general public, destroy the middle class though excessive taxation and deliberate over regulation, enroll and encourage millions of American to become life long government dependents, shutter NASA, destroy the world's finest healthcare delivery system, and muzzle political dissent though the misuse of federal agencies.
He has also funneled hundred of millions of tax dollars into the hands of most virulent and despicable religious zealots on the planet, demoralized and ruthlessly undercut the war fighting ability of the US armed forces; all the while deliberately spewing forth outrageous lies and Kafkaesque fabrications about every damn political issue, every damn minute, of every damn day.
And now the really bad news.
From the Daily Mail online:
"Thousands of tonnes" of the raw uranium ore can be turned into a dozen nuclear bombs a single year. That is, if the Iranians were to significantly increase the number of high-speed centrifuges to keep up with increased supply of raw ore.
From the International Business Times of July 31, 2013:
What a surprise that is......not!
Gosh, even the New York Times has finally spilled the beans about the new Iranian centrifuges; buried in the 13th paragraph of an article titled, "Obama Has Plans to Cut U.S. Nuclear Arsenal, if Russia Reciprocates."
Low-grade uranium ore had always been the Achilles heel of the Iranian nuclear program. Up till now a significant amount of additional time and effort was required for the isotope separation of the weapons grade U-235 from the non-fissionable U-238. Now that the Iranians will start with a higher quality ore, with a helping hand from the Chinese, their program will have a much quicker path in separating the U-235.
Think about that when you purchase Chinese made products from Wal-Mart and Apple.
What two counties would Iran most likely attack with their fledgling nuclear arsenal? Yep, Israel and the United States.
Would Israel use nuclear weapons in response to an Iranian nuclear attack? Sure, of course.
So. would President Barack H. Obama order a nuclear attack against Iran in response to a couple of Iranian nukes going off in New York and Miami? Hmmmm, probably not. Wouldn't Obama most likely tell us that America should first conclusively prove that the nukes were really of Iranian origin and we shouldn't rush to any premature conclusions?
Bottom line: Obama has that Noble Peace prize to wave around for the next 30 years and nuking a Muslim country, regardless of the provocation, would not be good for his presidential legacy or his elevation as Secretary-General of the United Nations.
FOLLOW US ON