Interesting article by Tim Carney in the Washington Examiner about Obama's concern about income inequality and how he indicts his own policies by making that point: Median household income has fallen by 5 percent since 2009 - when the recession ended and Obama came into office - as the Wall Street Journal pointed out after Obama's speech. But corporate profits and the stock market keep hitting record highs. How does Obama think these are points in his favor? If he's using this data to prove he's no Marxist, fine. Point granted. But Obama seems to think that middle-class and working-class stagnation under Obamanomics somehow calls for more Obamanomics. The unstated premise is this: More government means more equality, while the free market favors the rich and tramples on the rest. Liberals and mainstream journalists believe this, but so do some Republicans. When Mitt Romney dismisses the lower 47 percent of earners as hopelessly liberal, he's buying the notion that free...(Read Full Post)