NC Board of Elections Involved in Illegal Voting Practices

Ann Kane

Ever since Obama's 2008 election, grassroots conservatives in North Carolina have painstakingly reviewed and documented voter irregularities to see if fraud was taking place. Many discrepancies are still being found, but the nonprofit Civitas Institute has proof through a series of public records requests that the State Board of Elections worked with the Obama campaign to violate election laws.

The Civitas Institute has documented how SBE [State Board of Elections] bureaucrats conspired with a private company, working for the Obama campaign to facilitate a form of online voter registration for the 2012 General Election - in violation of state law. It's a classic example of how bureaucrats ignore the democratic process and hijack an agency for partisan purposes.

[snip]

Yet the SBE staff set in motion a scheme that in the last two months of the election resulted in more than 11,000 people being allowed to register online. Civitas has confirmed this by a public records request to all 100 counties and is still compiling the total number of registrations as counties comply with the request. Thus far, 68 percent of the registrations we have received were Democratic voters, 10 percent were Republican voters and 21 percent from unaffiliated voters.

Don Wright, SBE General Counsel, played word games when answering inquires about the Obama campaign's own re-election site Gottaregister.com, which utilized the technology that SBE staff approved.  Wright repeatedly denied that the SBE allowed online voter registration, insisting that it was "web-based voter registration" instead, as if there could be a "web-based" process that wasn't online.

The evidence of foul play in election results keeps piling up. If this happened in North Carolina, it probably occurred in other places because Obama and his team of conspirers would have taken the opportunity to increase votes in every state.

Now that North Carolina has a Republican governor, lieutenant governor and a majority of seats in the legislature, the SBE and Obama outsources will not be able to talk their way out of this one.

Read more Ann Kane at Potter Williams Report

James Simpson adds:

 

North Carolina does not allow online voting, but according to Civitas, SBE staff authorized an Obama campaign website, Gottaregister.com, to use a web-based registration program. The SBE's chief lawyer responded to the charge with a plainly disingenuous 1984-newspeak answer:

Wright repeatedly denied that the SBE allowed online voter registration, insisting that it was "web-based voter registration"[ii] instead, as if there could be a "web-based" process that wasn't online.

The technology from Allpoint Voter Services uses remote-control pens to transmit "signatures" over the Internet, according to techpresident.com[iii]. After entering voter information in an online form, the citizen "signs" it with a stylus or a finger. The Allpoint technology records the signature and then transmits it to one of two autopens - one in California, the other in Nevada[iv]. One of the pens transcribes the signature on to a paper voter registration form. Allpoint then mails the documents to local election boards - or is supposed to, a point we'll come back to.

To say this is not "online" registration but "web-based" is like saying a certain vehicle is not a car, it's an automobile. The point of having a "wet signature" -- one in ink -- is to provide a universally accepted way proving that a prospective voter is affirming in person all the facts on the form. To have an auto pen inserted at one point in this long computerized process is a far different thing. Even the Obama campaign called it online voter registration. Because, no matter how you twist words around, that's what it is.

The Obama administration has shown itself over and over to be completely contemptuous of the law. As I described in a WorldNetDaily article last November, the Obama administration was willing to use whatever means at its disposal to win this election, legal and illegal. Up until now, my assumption has been that, while they plainly engaged in vote fraud in some circumstances, it wasn't enough to throw the election. Depending upon whether or not they used tricks like this nationwide - and they probably did - they may have in fact stolen this election.

Ever since Obama's 2008 election, grassroots conservatives in North Carolina have painstakingly reviewed and documented voter irregularities to see if fraud was taking place. Many discrepancies are still being found, but the nonprofit Civitas Institute has proof through a series of public records requests that the State Board of Elections worked with the Obama campaign to violate election laws.

The Civitas Institute has documented how SBE [State Board of Elections] bureaucrats conspired with a private company, working for the Obama campaign to facilitate a form of online voter registration for the 2012 General Election - in violation of state law. It's a classic example of how bureaucrats ignore the democratic process and hijack an agency for partisan purposes.

[snip]

Yet the SBE staff set in motion a scheme that in the last two months of the election resulted in more than 11,000 people being allowed to register online. Civitas has confirmed this by a public records request to all 100 counties and is still compiling the total number of registrations as counties comply with the request. Thus far, 68 percent of the registrations we have received were Democratic voters, 10 percent were Republican voters and 21 percent from unaffiliated voters.

Don Wright, SBE General Counsel, played word games when answering inquires about the Obama campaign's own re-election site Gottaregister.com, which utilized the technology that SBE staff approved.  Wright repeatedly denied that the SBE allowed online voter registration, insisting that it was "web-based voter registration" instead, as if there could be a "web-based" process that wasn't online.

The evidence of foul play in election results keeps piling up. If this happened in North Carolina, it probably occurred in other places because Obama and his team of conspirers would have taken the opportunity to increase votes in every state.

Now that North Carolina has a Republican governor, lieutenant governor and a majority of seats in the legislature, the SBE and Obama outsources will not be able to talk their way out of this one.

Read more Ann Kane at Potter Williams Report

James Simpson adds:

 

North Carolina does not allow online voting, but according to Civitas, SBE staff authorized an Obama campaign website, Gottaregister.com, to use a web-based registration program. The SBE's chief lawyer responded to the charge with a plainly disingenuous 1984-newspeak answer:

Wright repeatedly denied that the SBE allowed online voter registration, insisting that it was "web-based voter registration"[ii] instead, as if there could be a "web-based" process that wasn't online.

The technology from Allpoint Voter Services uses remote-control pens to transmit "signatures" over the Internet, according to techpresident.com[iii]. After entering voter information in an online form, the citizen "signs" it with a stylus or a finger. The Allpoint technology records the signature and then transmits it to one of two autopens - one in California, the other in Nevada[iv]. One of the pens transcribes the signature on to a paper voter registration form. Allpoint then mails the documents to local election boards - or is supposed to, a point we'll come back to.

To say this is not "online" registration but "web-based" is like saying a certain vehicle is not a car, it's an automobile. The point of having a "wet signature" -- one in ink -- is to provide a universally accepted way proving that a prospective voter is affirming in person all the facts on the form. To have an auto pen inserted at one point in this long computerized process is a far different thing. Even the Obama campaign called it online voter registration. Because, no matter how you twist words around, that's what it is.

The Obama administration has shown itself over and over to be completely contemptuous of the law. As I described in a WorldNetDaily article last November, the Obama administration was willing to use whatever means at its disposal to win this election, legal and illegal. Up until now, my assumption has been that, while they plainly engaged in vote fraud in some circumstances, it wasn't enough to throw the election. Depending upon whether or not they used tricks like this nationwide - and they probably did - they may have in fact stolen this election.