|
| |||||||
« Obama's Perfect Second Inauguration |
| Diversity and Racism »
January 21, 2013
Liberal Dilemma: When Gun Rights Meet Victim GroupsIn a week full of many gun rights controversies, I was thinking of writing an article about the fact that there must be a gay guy or gal who wants guns to protect him- or herself from violent anti-gay bigots, whatever those bigots' rationalizations. Yesterday, the article was written for me, and it featured an amazing life story.
Claire Gordon, a Huffington Post contributor, writing at America Online, told the story of someone who breaks all the stereotypical images that people on both sides of the gun control issue may have. Her article spotlights a gay black Democrat who is a U.S. Army veteran and currently owns a gun store in Austin, Texas.
Claire Gordon writes:
Both Gov. Cuomo and President Obama totally ignored the plight of gays and blacks wishing to defend themselves against violence when calling for low magazine capacities. Apparently we are to believe that the Ku Klux Klan and those like them never ride in groups, and thus seven shots is enough to thwart their violent intentions. As Ann Coulter wrote in April of 2012:
One could also add that a battered female gun owner in a safe house would need some sort of equalizer if her home address, shown for weeks on the Westchester County, NY-based Journal News website, is visited by a belligerent ex-husband -- or, in some cases, an ex-gay lover. Yes, violent behavior in the real world isn't limited to the most frequently discussed type of assailant: males. Of course, this also applies to those battered women who live in places in America not exposed on interactive newspaper maps.
But let's take another look at Mr. Cargill's interview in the AOL article:
Clearly, Michael Cargill probably has no plans to run for mayor of New York City, Chicago or San Francisco. He said, "Don't make people feel guilty about protecting themselves"? If he said that Joseph McCarthy was a great senator, would liberals be any less outraged? In fact, the article concludes with:
As of Monday noon, January 21, this article on AOL has drawn 481 comments, some of them critical of Mr. Cargill's stand in life. Yes, he really does annoy liberals, who believe that everyone should categorically agree with them because their theoretical positions are "a higher truth" than the positions of any person out there living in and interacting with the real world.
|
||
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|
|