Time Magazine's motherhood cover is a disgrace.

Time Magazine's motherhood cover is a disgrace.

It looks nothing like the real and loving act of a mother nursing her baby and is thus vulgar.

The child is oddly and uncomfortably too old and large and both parties are coldly depicted without any trapping of nursing, suggesting pornography.

And, of course, the composition glorifies single motherhood.

It is anti-family, anti-child, a disgrace and a sixties cliché for "liberation." It is also a perfect snapshot of Barak Obama's way "Forward" for the country.


Time Magazine's motherhood cover is a disgrace.

It looks nothing like the real and loving act of a mother nursing her baby and is thus vulgar.

The child is oddly and uncomfortably too old and large and both parties are coldly depicted without any trapping of nursing, suggesting pornography.

And, of course, the composition glorifies single motherhood.

It is anti-family, anti-child, a disgrace and a sixties cliché for "liberation." It is also a perfect snapshot of Barak Obama's way "Forward" for the country.


RECENT VIDEOS