|
| |||||||
« Lightbulb bill probably going down to defeat in House |
Blog Home Page
| MediaMatters Takes another Shot at Stirring Up Anti-Truth Outrage »
July 13, 2011
When you rely on the governmentThank goodness for the safety and security of government sponsored defined benefit plans and Social Security. For the past 60 years Americans have been told by Democrats that only these programs can truly be counted on for genuine retirement security. And millions of teachers, firefighters, policemen and other government employees have been all too eager to "leave the driving to us" when it came to retirement planning. In the Democrat World, individuals could never actually "invest" any of their Social Security contributions in something as risky as the stock market because unlike Social Security, it's not guaranteed. Well, that appeared to be the case until President Obama called the upcoming August checks into question. He put it this way to CBS News:
This new twist on safety is also being felt in the small city of Central Falls, R.I., which appears headed for default. The New York Times reports that pensioners there could be left high and dry.
Police and firefighters in Central Falls sure wish that Wisconsin's Scott Walker had been their governor years ago and applied some controls over collective bargaining.
So, whether its Social Security or government sponsored defined benefit plans, politicians are being shown to be poor businessmen. For years, politicians have told Americans that they need not worry, that their Social Security contributions were being put into a "lock box." Now AARP members are awaking to the "IOU" in the lock box from Uncle Sam. In fact, the only security eligible for the lock box is a special treasury note. Imagine if a publicly traded company handled its retirement plan in such a manner -- having to borrow to make payments or only owning its own stock. Management would be imprisoned. Now, imagine that the Social Security box could actually hold dividend paying stocks of some our nation's largest companies, such as McDonalds, AT&T, Altria or Johnson and Johnson. During the crash of 2008 the value of those stocks would have plummeted. But the stream of dividend income would have been uninterrupted. That income could have become monthly checks. Not only that, but the stocks themselves have rebounded in value quite nicely. Wouldn't every retiree feel more comfortable knowing that his social security check was the combination of earnings unrelated to the government (dividends) and contributions? So who do you love? Or trust. |
||
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|
|