The question is why?And it is posed in response to a statement made on behalf of the secretary-general of the UN this week:"A way must be found for Jerusalem to emerge as a capital of two states."It is, of course, important to keep in mind that Ban Ki-moon represents one of the most morally deficient of international agencies, an agency that is blatantly and unabashedly anti-Israel. And yet... and yet... there is a perversity to Ban's logic - or absence thereof - that is greatly troubling.Every single resolution of the UN Security Council pertinent to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has said that the issues must be resolved via negotiations between the parties.  And here comes the head of the UN, with a statement that directly undermines that principle:  He is prepared to state before the fact of final negotiations what the outcome "must" be.And why "must" it be?  Apparently because he sees the formation of a Palestinian state as a...(Read Full Post)