|
| |||||||
|
« Budget Wars: Have We Lost My Mom's America? |
Blog Home Page
| When green schemes go bad »
February 20, 2011 Oddly behaving congressmen told by staff to get help days before election
Nobody can say if Congressman David Wu (D-OR) is mentally ill. Only a competent psychiatrist can make that call after a battery of tests have been administered.
But senior members of the congressman's staff were concerned enough about his weird behavior to confront him just prior to the election and ask him to seek help. The Oregonian: Three days before the Nov. 2 election, U.S. Rep. David Wu's most loyal and senior staffers were so alarmed by his erratic behavior that they demanded he enter a hospital for psychiatric treatment. The day after Wu won election to a 7th term, almost his entire staff resigned. The facts reported in the Oregonian article makes clear that Wu, the man, should elicit sympathy for failing to acknowledge the very serious mental health issues confronting him. His staff took as much as they could before abandoning him. Should they have left just prior to the election if they felt that strongly about Wu's mental health? Such would have been a betrayal - a real Judas moment - and professionals from either party would never have done it. Should the voters of his district been made aware of Wu's problems? By this time, his erratic behavior was obvious to anyone paying a reasonable amount of attention to the race. If anyone is to blame for not highlighting Wu's behavior and demanding an explanation, it is media like the liberal Oregonian and other Democratic friendly newspapers and TV stations. Apparently, they desired a victory by a Democrat over a tough opponent more than they cared about a potentially unstable congressmen representing their readers and viewers. Wu issued a statement yesterday on the controversy: Late Friday his office sent a prepared statement. In it he said that he was "not always at my best with staff or constituents" and that he sought "professional medical care." Perhaps an intervention by the Democratic leadership in this matter is warranted. But if he's not going to listen to those closest to him, it is doubtful he will take heed of the advice coming from his party. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|