|
| |||||||
|
« A bit of Christmas whimsy |
Blog Home Page
| Leave it to Harvard to find a druggie connection to Christmas »
December 25, 2010 Americans prefer artificial trees to real ones
Not surprising, but interesting. Reuters reports:
Far more Canadians, Americans and Britons will celebrate Christmas with artificial Christmas trees in their houses than real ones, according to a survey released on Friday. I'm surprised that fire hazard of real trees was not given as a reason for preferring artificial ones. Growing up, we had two trees; an artificial one in the living room and a real one in the basement. We didn't put any lights on the real one because my dad was worried about a short. Of course, keeping the tree well watered helps but after 10 days or so, even water in the base doesn't matter as the tree dries out. The fire hazard is real as the National Fire Protection Association points out: Between 2003-2008, U.S. fire departments responded to an average of 260 home fires that started with Christmas trees each year, according to the NFPA. Fires involving Christmas trees caused an average of 14 deaths, 26 injuries, and $13.8 million in direct property damage annually with one of every 21 fires resulting in death. The choice of real vs. artificial breaks down in an interesting way politically: "In the United States, 20 percent of Republicans favor an authentic tree, while only 15 percent of Democrats concur. In Canada, a quarter of respondents who voted for the Green Party in the last federal election (24 percent) choose a real tree, while 63 percent of Conservative Party voters go for the imitation tree. In Britain, only 11 percent of Labour Party voters choose a real tree - compared to 18 percent of Conservatives and 15 percent of Liberal Democrats," the statement said.Conservatives being more traditionalist seems to play a role in the difference between Republicans and Democrats. HT: Hot Air headline |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|