|
| |||||||
|
« Wash. Post tears into Israeli airport security checks that profile Arabs |
Blog Home Page
| Has security trumped freedom? »
November 28, 2010 Obama vs. Mubarak - no contest
Egypt's parliamentary elections are today and President Mubarak has made it clear that he wants no interference from anyone while he rigs the ballot for a favorable outcome.
In the last few weeks, his regime has rounded up thousands of activists, silenced numerous critics on television, closed down TV and radio stations who oppose him, and restrictions have been placed on texting. Meanwhile, Mr. Obama and his State Department have been publicly quiet about these abuses while barely mentioning human rights in private. A Washington Post editorial relates how this affects our foreign policy in the Middle East: The president and his secretary of state have brought up democracy and human rights in private conversations with Egyptian leaders but shied away from them in public. They have failed to make any connection between Mr. Mubarak's domestic repression and the more than $1 billion in U.S. aid Egypt receives every year, much of it directed to the military. They have not supported efforts in Congress to pass legislation or even nonbinding resolutions linking bilateral relations to political reform. This is not a case like Pakistan where strategic considerations give that government a whip hand over US policy. A little jawboning about human rights in Egypt from Obama wouldn't hurt a bit and would send a message to other Arab states about our support for democracy. Instead, being "pushed around" by tinpot dictators like Mubarak seems to be our fate as long as Obama insists on treating Arab states with kid gloves. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|