|
| |||||||
|
« Imam Feisal Rauf and 'Islamic Revival' |
Blog Home Page
| Win or lose, Christine O'Donnell's no Barack Obama »
September 14, 2010 D'Souza: 'How Obama Thinks'
The most unexamined candidate in history often seems to be the most inexplicable President in history, generating no end of theories as to what makes him so antithetical to the American experience.
Dinesh D'Souza writing in Forbes: Barack Obama is the most antibusiness president in a generation, perhaps in American history. Thanks to him the era of big government is back. Obama runs up taxpayer debt not in the billions but in the trillions. He has expanded the federal government's control over home mortgages, investment banking, health care, autos and energy. The Weekly Standard summarizes Obama's approach as omnipotence at home, impotence abroad. D'Souza points out that some people say Obama is a socialist or a Marxist. The President of Kings College in New York offers a different explanation; that Obama is at heart, an anti-colonialist: Rejecting the socialist formula, Obama has shown no intention to nationalize the investment banks or the health sector. Rather, he seeks to decolonize these institutions, and this means bringing them under the government's leash. That's why Obama retains the right to refuse bailout paybacks--so that he can maintain his control. For Obama, health insurance companies on their own are oppressive racketeers, but once they submitted to federal oversight he was happy to do business with them. He even promised them expanded business as a result of his law forcing every American to buy health insurance.I think there are a lot of things motivating Obama and anticolonialism is certainly one of them. There is not doubt he identifies with the undeveloped world which is at the core of his foreign poilicy. But domestically, he appears to me to be just another far left Democrat who wants to spend other people's money to fund their fantastic social engineering schemes. The least complicated explanation is usually the correct one and while Dinesh has done a fine job in this analysis, I think he stretches the point too far. Hat Tip: Ed Lasky |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|