|
| |||||||
|
« Last roundup for the last Kennedy in Congress |
Blog Home Page
| 'Uppity is' as 'uppity does' »
February 12, 2010 Thinking outside the box on Iran
Even though the UN seems poised to strengthen sanctions against Iran, and unilateral sanctions by the US may be followed by some in the EU, the fact is that these options will not stop Iran from enriching uranium.
Bombing will delay, not destroy the Iranian's ability to make a bomb. Hence, as Michael Rubin points out in his AOL column, we need to "think outside the box" in order to find a solution: Here, Iran's trade union movement provides an answer. The Bush administration missed a "Gdansk moment" in 2005 when Tehran bus driver Mansour Osanlou, the Iranian equivalent of Poland's Lech Walesa, organized the Islamic Republic's first independent trade union. Sugar processors in southwestern Iran soon followed suit. Using unions to foment regime change is nothing new as was proved in Eastern Europe. But that was a process that took decades to bear fruit with the AFL-CIO being recruited as early as the Kennedy administration to make contact with potential labor leaders behind the Iron Curtain and facilitate the formation of unions independent of the communist governments. And there is no guarantee that regime change will stop Iran's drive to build nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad has made the nuclear issue one of state sovereignty - Iran has an absolute right to control the enrichment cycle. We have heard little from the opposition to dispute that. It's good to think out side of the box. But when there are limited options - all of them bad - there isn't much inside or outside the box that presents itself as a solution. Hat Tip: Ed Lasky |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|