« Obama may announce spending freeze |
Blog Home Page
| Pumping Iron in Gaza »
January 25, 2010
'Smart' is the new 'Big'
Obama says "big government" is not the answer to our big problems. He told an Elyria, Ohio Town Hall on January 22:
We don't need big government; we need smart government -- that works and interacts with the private sector to create opportunity for ordinary people. But it can't be this constant ideological argument. People need help. We need to provide them a helping hand. That's what we stand for.Maybe the "ideological argument" isn't whether big or small government is best, but rather, what the definition of "big government is"...is.
One measure would be the number of employees on the government payroll. According to the Competitive Enterprise Institute:
Thanks to the $800 billion stimulus package, and other huge government spending increases, the number of federal and state employees is projected to increase massively. The federal government's payroll may grow by more than 200,000, and perhaps as much as 600,000, over the course of the Obama administration. Obama's budgets, which would result in record deficit spending of $9.3 trillion, would add at least 100,000 additional bureaucrats during just his first budget, and perhaps as many as 250,000.
USA Today's updated Jobs Growth Forecast predicts a -0.2% decline in all sectors, contrasted with a 0.4% increase in government jobs.
And let's not forget the helping hand of the Stimulus, as noted in a Big Government commentary:
But the most relevant information on Recovery.gov is that most of the jobs created or saved are in the public sector. For instance, according to Vice President Biden, out of the 640,329 jobs, 325,000 went to education and 80,000 to construction jobs. The difference we will soon find out is going to other government jobs.
So even if we assume that the government could create jobs by spending our money, we can see that what this money is being spent on is big government.
To do his part for the Stimulus, Obama has appointed "czars" numbering 18 to 36 or higher (depending on the source), more than any other President in history. First Lady Michelle, not to be outdone by her husband, hired 26 attendants, "including a hair dresser and make-up artist."
What do the people think?
According to an October 2008 Rasmussen poll, a solid majority of Americans agreed with Reagan's famous inaugural quote:
Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.
Obama begs to differ with Reagan, as he asserts that we should stop having this "ideological argument" because "people need help" and "we" need to give people the "helping hand." And the "We", this "hand," is the Government. And an understanding of basic economics tells us that the Government doesn't fund itself. So while the "helping hand" increases the number of government jobs and programs, the other hand will have to help itself to the wallets of the American people.
But Obama asserts that this Government need not be "Big," but "Smart". Obama definitely makes the grade, as he told Oprah he would give himself a solid B+, and an A- if health care reform passes, while a Washington Times editorial noted:
We have witnessed government expanding by every means available...
As Obama told George Stephanopoulos this week: "if I just focus on policy, if I just focus on the, you know this provision, or that law, or are we making a good, rational decision here..." To which Stephanopoulos helpfully interjected: "That people would get it."
Obama agreed, and later added: "... one of the things that I have learned in Washington is you have to repeat yourself a lot because because [sic] unfortunately it doesn't penetrate."
So, repeat after me:
"Government is the solution."
Stay focused on the "helping hand" even while the other one reaches for your pocket.
And try to remember, "Smart" is the new "Big."