|
| |||||||
|
« Dem retirees present GOP with golden opportunities |
Blog Home Page
| Is the AP trying to sow discord between the US and Canada? »
December 4, 2009 White House invokes separation of powers in gate crashers case
Ed Lasky swears to me this is not a parody from The Onion website.
I don't know, Ed. This may be the most incredibly dumb use of presidential privilege in history; the White House is refusing to allow the president's social secretary - that's right, social secretary - to testify before Congress in the gate crashers case. Jen Rubin at Commentary has this reaction: They are kidding, right? Nope. Dead serious. Even the usually supportive media and law-professor contingent is gobsmacked by this hooey: Ed Lasky adds: Okay..so they go after CIA interrogators, leak CIA stories from the past, condemn GITMO interrogators, politicize policy differences, ---but protect Desiree Rogers-THE SOCIAL SECRETARY from scrutiny by invoking the separation of powers doctrine? Appalling, indeed. So a crony of Val Jarrett - the president's bestest friend in the whole world - is a little gun shy about going up to The Hill and explain in front of what would certainly be a massive TV audience, how in the hell two budding reality TV show hopefuls circumvented the vaunted Secret Service procedures and made it all the way to within kissing distance of Obama. And this requires the invocation of a president's most treasured prerogative? This is truly The Chicago Way of governing; the boss protects his friends - until he has to throw them under the bus. Expect a walkback on this as even the Democrats want to talk to Desiree Rogers. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|